Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Cliff Schmidt mentioned the header thing in reply to my question. Not
What was your question? --If you mentioned that, I seem to have missed it. :-) -jean > sure where it originated from. He was giving a 6 hour legal > presentation (!!!) one day, which I didn't attend because of the bad > case of ADD :-) > > Regarding missing CLA's, looks like we don't have a solution now. Let's > follow up on that later. BTW, looks like Andriy is the last person > who've made big contributions and whose CLA we don't have. And he made > an effort to send his CLA - so hopefully the ASF received it, just > overlooked it somehow. So I still hope that this issue will resolve > itself. > > Andrus > > > On Jul 9, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote: > >> Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> ... >> >>> 2. Migrate to Apache package naming and license. I've heard some >>> conflicting information at ApacheCon Dublin that the new soon-to-be- >>> published Apache policy does not require the Apache license header in >>> the source files. This may simplify the task. >> >> >> hmmm ... I wasn't in Dublin, but can think of two proposed policies that >> might have been discussed. >> >> The first is Cliff Schmidt's proposed third-party license policy here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html >> >> The second is Cliff Schmidt gave legal-discuss@ a heads up about a >> proposed source file header change back in June [1]. I've been tracking >> what needs to be done -- I think -- for Derby on DERBY-1377 [2], and >> that issue has a bunch of pointers into the legal-discuss@ list which >> might be helpful. But I'm still waiting for Cliff Schmidt to send email >> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> (I can't find an earlier >>> message, I think from Jean, clarifying the procedure for the code >>> contributed by people whom we couldn't track). >> >> >> If it's the new source header policy I don't think it has much, if >> anything, to do with obtaining ICLA's from cayenne contributors, >> including the emeritus contributors. btw, the post mentioning emeritus >> Cayenne contributors is at [3]. >> >> I've been watching OFBiz in the Incubator because they have a similar >> situation. --Or at least I think it's OFBiz. I thought I saw recent >> Incubator traffic posting which specific code was tied to a contributor >> they couldn't locate, but I'm not readily spotting it. I'll hunt it down >> and post it when I find it. >> >> -jean >> >> [1] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/ >> 200606.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377 >> [3] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cayenne-dev/ >> 200604.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >
