Mike Kienenberger wrote: > On 9/17/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 1. A release manager (me) posts the release files on people.apache.org >> 2. Internal vote and review within the project starts (who has a >> binding vote? PPMC or all committers? I'd say each committer should >> get a vote).
by "internal vote" I think public vote on cayenne-dev was intended, right? --that's correct. > Everyone gets a vote. Only PPMC members have binding votes. > >> 3. Once we pass that (72 hours??), we start the vote on the Incubator >> list (how many votes do we need there?) > > I think it's a majority, although we need at least three binding > positive votes. > Here's an additional resource with current info: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases So, 3 +1 votes on cayenne-dev with PPMC member votes binding. Also, 3 Incubator PMC votes are required for the Incubator to approve it (Incubator PMC members are listed at http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html). >> 4. Once we get through that, we post the release on Apache mirrors >> (how?) > > Haven't been involved in this area. I think Incubator releases still go up on http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/ but it would be good to check [email protected] archives to see if that's still the case. And if it isn't clear, post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- then we can contribute that info to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html . -jean
