Thanks Jean for clarification.
Answering your question...
On Sep 17, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
by "internal vote" I think public vote on cayenne-dev was intended,
right?
Yes, that's exactly what I meant.
Andrus
On Sep 17, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
On 9/17/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. A release manager (me) posts the release files on
people.apache.org
2. Internal vote and review within the project starts (who has a
binding vote? PPMC or all committers? I'd say each committer should
get a vote).
by "internal vote" I think public vote on cayenne-dev was intended,
right? --that's correct.
Everyone gets a vote. Only PPMC members have binding votes.
3. Once we pass that (72 hours??), we start the vote on the
Incubator
list (how many votes do we need there?)
I think it's a majority, although we need at least three binding
positive votes.
Here's an additional resource with current info:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
So, 3 +1 votes on cayenne-dev with PPMC member votes binding. Also, 3
Incubator PMC votes are required for the Incubator to approve it
(Incubator PMC members are listed at
http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html).
4. Once we get through that, we post the release on Apache mirrors
(how?)
Haven't been involved in this area.
I think Incubator releases still go up on
http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/ but it would be good to check
[email protected] archives to see if that's still the case.
And if it isn't clear, post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- then we can contribute
that info to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/
releasemanagement.html .
-jean
