Nathan Yergler wrote: > Hi Blaise, > > Thanks for the proposal. Thanks for your feedback. > PHP bindings + Drupal support for liblicense > may indeed be a complete project in itself. In addition to Denver > Open Media, I believe that an Australian team has also recently done > their own version for the Pool project. I guess the big question here > is what DOM plans to do and how much overlap there is. Please update > your proposal when you hear from them so we have a good idea of what > they're planning to do and how your work is differentiated from it. > I've contacted someone from Denver Open Media and they've forwarded my email onto their developers. I am waiting to hear back. I also submitted a query to the Pool project to see if their work has been made available anywhere.
I suppose, if there's an overlap with updated the Creative Commons module, if Pool has already done it or DOM is about to, I could shift the proposal's focus to liblicense. If there's still development work that's needed on updating the module though, maybe liblicense would be cut from the proposal. Thoughts? I guess it really depends on what I hear back from Pool and DOM... > Thanks again for the proposal; > > Nathan > > -- http://alleyneinc.net/ _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
