Someone asked me a very good question yesterday and I am still confused if I gave him the correct answer. He gave me a scenario that states that he has to limit all IP Precedence 3 traffic out of an interface to 256k, but he cannot use policing or rate-limiting. My answer was to use shaping. But from my experience, doesn't the word "limit" negates that as a possible answer? Even though you can use shaping to limit, I was always under the impression when studying for the CCIE that if they use the word limit that means no shaping. Can someone help ease my conscience?
- [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Police question Derek Winchester
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Police question Victor Cappuccio
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Police question Derek Winchester
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Police question Victor Cappuccio
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Police ques... Derek Winchester
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Police... Suresh Mishra
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Police ques... Scott Morris
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Police... Victor Cappuccio
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Po... Derek Winchester
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape v... Scott Morris
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape v... Suresh Mishra
