Hello, while doing the forth lab in last week's lab experience bootcamp i came
across a very annoying situation
actually, the solution mentioned that it was possible to get it
The problem itself is that i was running pppofr on a point to multipoint link,
i had originally advertised the networks in ospf as 0.0.0.255
the networks came into the ospf database but were not installed in the routing
table. The next hop for a given route kept pointing towards the wrong
virtual-access interface
after a few hours of playing with that i finally looked at the answer guide,
which advised to use a 0.0.0.0 wildcard mask for the ospf statement
i went on and reconfigured the statement, then i reloaded all the routers. My
surprise was that there was no change in the behavior
My question now is if you could please explain this situation to me. In the
solution it only mentioned that not putting a /32 mask on the ospf statement
could lead to unexpected behavior, but i would like to know a little more about
this, because at the end i wasnt able to make it work
Also, is there any specific ospf network type that proves to be more appropiate
for a pppofr p2multipoint configuration?
Thank you very much in advance
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
