That was one of the things we talked about after the lab (although I thought it was an earlier lab rather than #4!) because Jasmina had run across the same issue and after testing things out on different versions of IOS we had determined that things are apparantly more inline with the RFC now.
So what you saw there is the same thing we ran into that represents a change in IOS. Notes were made and the lab will be changed. But what worked on earlier IOS releases (I think 12.4(4a) was the release that exam was written under) will not work under current versions. As soon at things are changed to P2MP everything worked just fine. HTH, Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc. IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits! [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 http://www.ipexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of German Gonzalez Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PPPoFR with OSPF Hello, while doing the forth lab in last week's lab experience bootcamp i came across a very annoying situation actually, the solution mentioned that it was possible to get it The problem itself is that i was running pppofr on a point to multipoint link, i had originally advertised the networks in ospf as 0.0.0.255 the networks came into the ospf database but were not installed in the routing table. The next hop for a given route kept pointing towards the wrong virtual-access interface after a few hours of playing with that i finally looked at the answer guide, which advised to use a 0.0.0.0 wildcard mask for the ospf statement i went on and reconfigured the statement, then i reloaded all the routers. My surprise was that there was no change in the behavior My question now is if you could please explain this situation to me. In the solution it only mentioned that not putting a /32 mask on the ospf statement could lead to unexpected behavior, but i would like to know a little more about this, because at the end i wasnt able to make it work Also, is there any specific ospf network type that proves to be more appropiate for a pppofr p2multipoint configuration? Thank you very much in advance ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
