When you are asked for full reachability, you often need to test in different places and go back to add/fix things. Whatever wasn't explicitly told of you earlier in the lab should be added as you've done. HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc. IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 http://www.ipexpert.com _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2008 1:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: Hi scott, Hi group, I have just finished lab 10, however I would like, if possible, get a bit elucidation, namely in task 10.9 you tell "every router should see all route in their routing table and have full reachability to these addresses" The situation was follow R7 can`t see 2000:1:1:26::6, therefore don`t forward any packet to R2, same thing for R1 As weel I redistribuited also the connected,namely ipv6 address configured to tunnel and fast eth 0/0 on R6, because it has two different process routing, but why do you included also loopback of R6 in about it? I needed because.... I can reach L0 of R6 from R1: R1#pi 2000:1:1:6600:20A:B8FF:FE19:AB78 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2000:1:1:6600:20A:B8FF:FE19:AB78, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 52/52/52 ms Thanks a lot for your reply. -- This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the contents of this email. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks, as they consider appropriate. Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
