Bryan, Thanks, I did not do eigrp summary config since it was not asked in the lab, however route map on the redistribution worked also.
Will the asymmetric redistribution be a valid solution in your opinion? I mean there is no redundancy requirement and suboptimal routing is not supposed to be addressed unless specifically asked to do, correct? Thanks again! Stan On 8/31/09 9:06 PM, "Bryan Bartik" <[email protected]> wrote: > Stan, > > I believe you can summarize at R5 in EIGRP so the more specifics from BB2 are > not seen. Did you try this? > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Stan <[email protected]> wrote: >> That is ok. I am afraid in this case the lab needs to be taken into >> consideration. Summary-external not really applicable in this case... >> >> Anybody else who is familiar with this scenario cares to comment? >> >> Thanks in advance! >> Stan >> >> >> >> On 8/30/09 9:22 AM, "prakash patel" <[email protected] >> <http://[email protected]> > wrote: >> >>> I do not read lab when I answer >>> >>> Summary-external means " any external routes to any protocol" >>> >>> If they belong to same supernet, does any of your internal subnet falls >>> within the range if you summarize the external routes ? If not then >>> summarize >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:17:04 -0700 >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Volume 3 - Lab 5, redistribution >>> From: [email protected] <http://[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] <http://[email protected]> ; >>> [email protected] <http://[email protected]> ; >>> [email protected] <http://[email protected]> >>> >>> Prakash, >>> >>> Thanks for your reply! Yes, they do belong to the same supernet. In >>> addition to, ³summary-external² would be applicable to the redistribution >>> into OSPF, not EIGRP. In this case EIGRP domain receives the more specific >>> routes. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Stan >>> >>> >>> On 8/30/09 9:01 AM, "prakash patel" <[email protected] >>> <http://[email protected]> <http://hotmail.com/> > wrote: >>> >>>> If they belong to the same super net , then you should worry and ask. But >>>> if not , then do "summary-external" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:56:38 -0700 >>>> From: [email protected] <http://[email protected]> >>>> <http://gmail.com/> >>>> To: [email protected] <http://[email protected]> >>>> <http://onlinestudylist.com/> >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Volume 3 - Lab 5, redistribution >>>> >>>> Hi everybody! >>>> >>>> I am sure I am probably overreading the Volume 3 - Lab 5 questions, but >>>> here is the dilemma: >>>> >>>> 1.) Task 3.6: redistribution as needed to ensure all interfaces are >>>> reachable from all devices - PG and Video walktrhough both solve it by >>>> enabling mutual redistribution on R4, R5,R8. However this will bring all >>>> more specific networks from BB2 into the topology. Task 3.3 (OSPF), does >>>> asks us to summarize those same BB3 networks in such a way that : the rest >>>> of the topology sees a single route for the networks from the backbone". >>>> Now if the question was " the rest of the OSPF domain" or something >>>> similar, no problem there. >>>> >>>> How do we approach such a discrepancy at exam time? Would that be a legit >>>> proctor question? >>>> >>>> 2.) I simply solved it to both cover Task 3.3 and Task 3.6 by not >>>> redistributing OPSF into EIGRP on R5. Reachability is still maintained >>>> (yes, suboptimal routing), but BB2 networks are only seen as a single >>>> summary throughout the topology. Since there is no requirement for >>>> redundancy, I think this should be a valid solution or am I missing >>>> something? >>>> >>>> Any thoughts would be appreciated. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Stan >>>> >>>> >>>> Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it >>>> now. >>>> <http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US >>>> :WM_HYGN_faster:082009> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com> >>> >>> >>> Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you¹re up to on >>> Facebook. Find out more. >>> <http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:O >>> N:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com> >> > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
