Stan, It all depends on what the lab ask you do. In this case it appears to be fine.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Stan <[email protected]> wrote: > Bryan, > > Thanks, I did not do eigrp summary config since it was not asked in the > lab, however route map on the redistribution worked also. > > Will the asymmetric redistribution be a valid solution in your opinion? I > mean there is no redundancy requirement and suboptimal routing is not > supposed to be addressed unless specifically asked to do, correct? > > Thanks again! > > Stan > > > On 8/31/09 9:06 PM, "Bryan Bartik" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Stan, > > I believe you can summarize at R5 in EIGRP so the more specifics from BB2 > are not seen. Did you try this? > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Stan <[email protected]> wrote: > > That is ok. I am afraid in this case the lab needs to be taken into > consideration. Summary-external not really applicable in this case... > > Anybody else who is familiar with this scenario cares to comment? > > Thanks in advance! > Stan > > > > On 8/30/09 9:22 AM, "prakash patel" <[email protected] < > http://[email protected]> > wrote: > > I do not read lab when I answer > > Summary-external means " any external routes to any protocol" > > If they belong to same supernet, does any of your internal subnet falls > within the range if you summarize the external routes ? If not then > summarize > > > > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:17:04 -0700 > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Volume 3 - Lab 5, redistribution > From: [email protected] <http://[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <http://[email protected]> ; > [email protected] <http://[email protected]> ; > [email protected] <http://[email protected]> > > Prakash, > > Thanks for your reply! Yes, they do belong to the same supernet. In > addition to, “summary-external” would be applicable to the redistribution > into OSPF, not EIGRP. In this case EIGRP domain receives the more specific > routes. > > Cheers, > Stan > > > On 8/30/09 9:01 AM, "prakash patel" <[email protected] < > http://[email protected]> <http://hotmail.com/> > wrote: > > If they belong to the same super net , then you should worry and ask. But > if not , then do "summary-external" > > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:56:38 -0700 > From: [email protected] <http://[email protected]> < > http://gmail.com/> > To: [email protected] <http://[email protected]> < > http://onlinestudylist.com/> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Volume 3 - Lab 5, redistribution > > Hi everybody! > > I am sure I am probably overreading the Volume 3 - Lab 5 questions, but > here is the dilemma: > > 1.) Task 3.6: redistribution as needed to ensure all interfaces are > reachable from all devices - PG and Video walktrhough both solve it by > enabling mutual redistribution on R4, R5,R8. However this will bring all > more specific networks from BB2 into the topology. Task 3.3 (OSPF), does > asks us to summarize those same BB3 networks in such a way that : *the > rest of the topology* sees a single route for the networks from the > backbone". Now if the question was " *the rest of the OSPF domain*" or > something similar, no problem there. > > How do we approach such a discrepancy at exam time? Would that be a legit > proctor question? > > 2.) I simply solved it to both cover Task 3.3 and Task 3.6 by not > redistributing OPSF into EIGRP on R5. Reachability is still maintained (yes, > suboptimal routing), but BB2 networks are only seen as a single summary > throughout the topology. Since there is no requirement for redundancy, I > think this should be a valid solution or am I missing something? > > Any thoughts would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Stan > > ------------------------------ > Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it > now. < > http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_faster:082009> > > ------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com> > > > ------------------------------ > Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on > Facebook. Find out more. < > http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009> > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com> > > > > -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
