Agreed with you Matt.
Cheers
________________________________
From: Matt Hill <[email protected]>
To: nicholas golden <[email protected]>
Cc: OSL CCIE-RS <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 6:53:51
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] problem with interface with eigrp adjacency
Realistically though... there is a limit. I dont mind helping a LITTLE with
dynamips/gns3. If you get stuck, go to the Ubuntu or GNS3 forums.
I am not going to go to the Ubuntu forum and ask anyone how to configure OSPF
or MPLS-TE now am I?
Cheers,
Matt
CCIE #22386
CCSI #31207
2009/10/22 nicholas golden <[email protected]>
My 2 cents (maybe 5 cents, not sure yet).
>
>Since buying ipexpert lab books and VOD and since that some of the staff have
>used GNS3/dynamips with great success and others as well, I find that while
>the particulars of getting Ubuntu installed and getting IM to work are outside
>the scope of this forum, I believe GNS3 itself and the topologies involving
>ipexpert's workbooks are fair game as well as trying to hook up a quad NIC to
>the Gns3 topology and some wierd stuff to watch out for.
>
> It's good to know the nuances of specifics on a task that isn't covered
> elsewhere. I certainly would not go to GNS3 and ask about "Task 4.1 in
> ipexpert's workbook - configure technology X so I do it and it does this and
> that what's the problem" while I may get some answers, I would have a better
> chance getting answers from people using the same workbooks as myself,
> using dynamips/gns3. The time it takes to go back and forth and wait, in the
> meantime sifting through "troll" postings is insane. At least here, there's
> no trolls to shoot anyone down.
>
>With that said, I believe that workbooks + gns3/dynamips are fair game since
>it is related to CCIE RS and it's good to leverage off others who have already
>done it.
>
>So with all that, I understand and even side with Adrian and Jeff and respect
>both opinions. The Ubuntu configuration extraordinaire emails and how to set
>that up I believe are outside the scope, and that does belong on the ubuntu
>forums, but the gns3 stuff I think is fair game, as long as it's related to
>workbooks, and lab tasks and maybe some basic hardware questions.
>
>-Nick
>
>--- On Wed, 10/21/09, Jeffrey W. Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>From:
>> Jeffrey W. Hall <[email protected]>
>>
>>Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] problem with interface with eigrp adjacency
>>To: "'Adrian Brayton'" <[email protected]>, "'OSL CCIE-RS'"
>><[email protected]>
>>>>Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 9:00 AM
>>
>>
>>
>>Respectfully.....no. This is not just a CCIE theory forum, but also a CCIE
>>lab preparation forum as well. With that, questions related to even being
>>>>able to do the labs should fall within the scope of this forum. You are
>>absolutely correct that other forums exists that also address these issues,
>>but most of us are too busy working around the clock to afford the
>>>>unproductive time of bouncing between multiple forums.
>>
>>I agree 100% with your sentiment and good intentions, but in a practical
>>sense, this is the appropriate place to discuss issues hindering people from
>>completing labs.
>>
>>This is only my two cents
>> and I absolutely respect your point of view on
>>this.
>>
>>Jeff
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [email protected]
>>>>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adrian Brayton
>>Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 8:31 AM
>>To: OSL CCIE-RS
>>>>Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] problem with interface with eigrp adjacency
>>
>>I am sure that I am going to receive a lot of criticism on this post
>>but here it goes...
>>
>>I understand how important GNS3 / Dynamips is to everyone and there
>>>>lab studies but this is a forum for CCIE Routing and Switching
>>questions... Not how to fix issues with Dynamips, Not on how to
>>install Linux or how to
>> reduce CPU usage or IM issues... There are
>>plenty of high quality forum's that address all of these various
>>issue's but this isn't one of them!
>>
>>I am not affiliated with IPexpert but they do have to pay for the BW
>>>>on sending out thousands of e-mails that have nothing to do with the
>>CCIE Lab or the written exam!
>>
>>So can we just keep this forum focused on CCIE Routing and
>>Switching?!?!?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Oct 21, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
>>
>>>> i think that the problem here is because dynamips, i think when
>>>> there are many
>>>> routers which run at the same time there si problem with some
>>>> interfaces with
>>>> dynamips, anyone knows about this problem,
>>>>>
>>> I think you are quite right and I believe that we concluded that long
>>> ago in this thread. We're just taking the idea further... sort of
>> a
>>> mental exercise :-)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marko
>>> CCIE #18427 (SP)
>>> My network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>>>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
New Email names for you!
Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail.
Hurry before someone else does!
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
