Bauke, Is there another router in either the OSPF or RIP domain that needs reachability information from the opposing protocol? If the answer is no, then there is no need to redistribute.
Steve On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Bauke Dzavhale < [email protected]> wrote: > Team, > > Say I have a router where one interface is running 2 protocols. > > When it comes to redistribution, does it make sense to redistribute between > the 2 protocols in the same router? > The most close example of what I am trying to understand is R4, LAB > 7-Vol2. > Even though the DSG does not redistribute between RIP and OSPF at R4 ( and > I still believe it should...posted this question but no answer yet...) I am > left wondering what purpose redistribution would serve since int s0/0/0 runs > both protocols. The reason I believe redistribution should occur is because > the requirements in task 3-1 and 3-3 ask for R4 to run RIP and OSPF in int > s0/0/0, but no redistribution is done afterwards, and I am left wondering > why... > Any comments > > Thanks > > Bauke > > ------------------------------ > > *Yahoo! Canada Toolbar :* Search from anywhere on the web and bookmark > your favourite sites. Download it now! <http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com/> > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
