Hi,

Since I did not know what "fallback bridging" was, I looked it up on the
web. Unfortunately, the more I look, the less I seem to grasp it.
What I understand is that it can be used to bridge NON IP packets
between VLANs on a switch.
What I do not understand is how this would work "spanning-tree" wise.
Some literature seems to refer to a "VLAN spanning tree protocol" which
would be something different from the standard IEEE spanning-tree
protocol. Never heard of that. Is this correct, and what would be the
fundamental differences?

Second, to understand this technology better, I started a little
experiment. I did this on cat4:

    bridge irb
    bridge 3 protocol vlan-bridge
    bridge 3 route ip

    interface Vlan2200
     no ip address
     bridge-group 3
    !
    interface Vlan2300
     no ip address
     bridge-group 3
    !
    interface BVI3
     ip address 150.100.81.4 255.255.255.0
    !

Also I gave R8 and R9 IP addresses: 150.100.81.8 and 150.100.81.9.
Then I tried to see if I could ping R8, R9 and CAT4; but none of it worked.

I assumed that by routing IP on the bridge that R8 and R9 would be able
to see each other; but they are not even able to ping the switch BVI
address.

Should this work or not?

Regards,

Frank





_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to