This won't change the next hop ip address inside the rip updates though. A show ip route won't show cat4 as the next-hop for routes advertised from bb3.

On 12 Aug, 2010,at 03:53 PM, Samir Idris <[email protected]> wrote:

Marc,

Simply make this BB3 interface passive.  Use the neighbor command to peer with Cat4 interface and off you go.  Cat4 will get the route from BB3 and because of the peering between Cat4 and R8, it will get BB3 route from Cat4.  Sorry for using the word peering in case of RIP.

I hope this helps.

Regards,
Samir.

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:28 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to
       [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
       http://onlinestudylistcom/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
       [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
       [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Rip distance problem (marc abel)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:28:26 -0500
From: marc abel <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Rip distance problem
Message-ID:
       <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I have 3 routers/switches participating in rip as in the diagram attached.
The goal is to make R8 see the routes advertised by bb3 as if they are from
Cat4. I have disabled split horizon on the CAT4 vlan50 interface.

Here is my R8 config

router rip
 version 2
 redistribute ospf 1 metric 10
 passive-interface default
 no passive-interface FastEthernet0/0
 network 110.0.0.0
 distance 255
 distance 121 110.99.200.22 0.0.0.0
 distance 111 110.99.200.40 0.0.0.0
 no auto-summary

but when I do a show ip ro rip

R8(config-router)#do show ip ro rip
    110.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 12 subnets, 4 masks
R       110.99.104.104/32 [111/1] via 110.99.200.40, 00:00:10,
FastEthernet0/0
    192.168.2.0/32 is subnetted, 4 subnets
R       192.168.2.2 [111/2] via 110.99.20022, 00:00:10, FastEthernet0/0
R       192.168.2.3 [111/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:10, FastEthernet0/0
R       192.168.2.1 [111/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:10, FastEthernet0/0
R       192.168.2.4 [111/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:10, FastEthernet0/0

What am I missing?

Thank you,

Marc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </archives/ccie_rs/attachments/20100811/4c25f59f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: problem.png
Type: image/png
Size: 38829 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </archives/ccie_rs/attachments/20100811/4c25f59f/attachment.png>

End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 55, Issue 31
***************************************



--
Samir Idris
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpertcom
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to