Ah, that's right, there was no verification for the task. I guess I
should add that to the list of things to be updated in Volume 2 :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

Mailto: [email protected]
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:09, garry baker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marko,
>
> I didnt see it I was going off what Marc had said in his posts:
> "The solution guide doesn't show any verification for the task so
>  it is hard to tell how they define "see the rip routes" I had interpreted
> it
>  to mean the VIA address in show ip ro.
>  R       192.168.3.3 [120/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/"
>
> I am just an innocent bystander at this point :)
>
> thanks for the followup though...
> Garry..
>
> --
> Garry L. Baker
>
> "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Garry,
>>
>> Did you consult the solutions guide for this task? I just read through
>> it and I think it makes things pretty clear... or amI missing the
>> point as to what the uncertainty about the task in question is?
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>>
>> Mailto: [email protected]
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:39, garry baker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Yes i would like to hear what they mean by "see the rip routes"
>> >
>> > I just dont see how you could get it to work without split horizon on
>> > that
>> > Cat4 interface...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:43 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This is vol 2 lab 3 task 3.5:
>> >>
>> >> Configre Rip for R8 and Cat4 on Vlna F. R8 should see the rip routes
>> >> for
>> >> the backbone via Cat4, not directly from bb2.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> My original solution was to build a tunnel between R8 and Cat4 and run
>> >> rip
>> >> over that, and not on R8's F0/0 interface. That worked but then I
>> >> looked in
>> >> the solution guide to see how they had solved it. The solution guide
>> >> just
>> >> shows them using the distance command and no split horizon, not any
>> >> passive
>> >> interfaces. The solution guide doesn't show any verification for the
>> >> task so
>> >> it is hard to tell how they define "see the rip routes" I had
>> >> interpreted it
>> >> to mean the VIA address in show ip ro.
>> >> R       192.168.3.3 [120/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:57 AM, garry baker <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> to see them as they cam from Cat4? do you mean see the update source
>> >>> as
>> >>> Cat4 'show ip protocol' will show the update source and if you use
>> >>> unicast
>> >>> neighbors (passive default all the intefaces to keep the multicast
>> >>> from
>> >>> working also) with split horizon on Cat4 the updates will pass through
>> >>> and
>> >>> come from Cat4 but the 'show ip route' will still show the next-hop as
>> >>> BB3
>> >>>
>> >>> I do not know of a next-hop-self command for rip, but you could use a
>> >>> summary address from Cat4?
>> >>>
>> >>> R8#sh ip protocols
>> >>> Routing Protocol is "rip"
>> >>>   Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
>> >>>   Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
>> >>>   Sending updates every 30 seconds, next due in 0 seconds
>> >>>   Invalid after 180 seconds, hold down 180, flushed after 240
>> >>>   Redistributing: rip
>> >>>   Neighbor(s):
>> >>>     110.99.200.40
>> >>>   Default version control: send version 2, receive version 2
>> >>>   Automatic network summarization is not in effect
>> >>>   Maximum path: 4
>> >>>   Routing for Networks:
>> >>>     110.0.0.0
>> >>>   Passive Interface(s):
>> >>>     FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>     FastEthernet0/1
>> >>>     VoIP-Null0
>> >>>   Routing Information Sources:
>> >>>     Gateway         Distance      Last Update
>> >>>     110.99.200.40        120      00:00:06
>> >>>   Distance: (default is 120)
>> >>> R8#sh ip route
>> >>> Gateway of last resort is not set
>> >>>      110.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>> >>> C       110.99.200.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>      192.168.2.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>> >>> R       192.168.2.2 [120/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:19,
>> >>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>      192.168.3.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>> >>> R       192.168.3.3 [120/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:19,
>> >>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>
>> >>> Routing table after using ip summary on interface of CAT4:
>> >>>
>> >>> R8#sh ip route
>> >>> Gateway of last resort is not set
>> >>>      110.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>> >>> C       110.99.200.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
>> >>> R    192.168.2.0/24 [120/2] via 110.99.200.40, 00:00:26,
>> >>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>> R    192.168.3.0/24 [120/2] via 110.99.200.40, 00:00:26,
>> >>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Garry L. Baker
>> >>>
>> >>> "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:28 AM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have 3 routers/switches participating in rip as in the diagram
>> >>>> attached. The goal is to make R8 see the routes advertised by bb3 as
>> >>>> if they
>> >>>> are from Cat4. I have disabled split horizon on the CAT4 vlan50
>> >>>> interface.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Here is my R8 config
>> >>>>
>> >>>> router rip
>> >>>>  version 2
>> >>>>  redistribute ospf 1 metric 10
>> >>>>  passive-interface default
>> >>>>  no passive-interface FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>  network 110.0.0.0
>> >>>>  distance 255
>> >>>>  distance 121 110.99.200.22 0.0.0.0
>> >>>>  distance 111 110.99.200.40 0.0.0.0
>> >>>>  no auto-summary
>> >>>>
>> >>>> but when I do a show ip ro rip
>> >>>>
>> >>>> R8(config-router)#do show ip ro rip
>> >>>>      110.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 12 subnets, 4 masks
>> >>>> R       110.99.104.104/32 [111/1] via 110.99.200.40, 00:00:10,
>> >>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>      192.168.2.0/32 is subnetted, 4 subnets
>> >>>> R       192.168.2.2 [111/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:10,
>> >>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>> R       192.168.2.3 [111/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:10,
>> >>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>> R       192.168.2.1 [111/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:10,
>> >>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>> R       192.168.2.4 [111/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:10,
>> >>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What am I missing?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thank you,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Marc
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please
>> > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to