Marko, my confusion was if merely seeing the rip updates come from Cat4 was enough, or if we needed to see Cat4 as the next hop to those routes.
Thank you, Marc On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>wrote: > Ah, that's right, there was no verification for the task. I guess I > should add that to the list of things to be updated in Volume 2 :-) > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > > FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture > > Mailto: [email protected] > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:09, garry baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Marko, > > > > I didnt see it I was going off what Marc had said in his posts: > > "The solution guide doesn't show any verification for the task so > > it is hard to tell how they define "see the rip routes" I had > interpreted > > it > > to mean the VIA address in show ip ro. > > R 192.168.3.3 [120/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/" > > > > I am just an innocent bystander at this point :) > > > > thanks for the followup though... > > Garry.. > > > > -- > > Garry L. Baker > > > > "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > >> > >> Garry, > >> > >> Did you consult the solutions guide for this task? I just read through > >> it and I think it makes things pretty clear... or amI missing the > >> point as to what the uncertainty about the task in question is? > >> > >> -- > >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > >> > >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture > >> > >> Mailto: [email protected] > >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:39, garry baker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > Yes i would like to hear what they mean by "see the rip routes" > >> > > >> > I just dont see how you could get it to work without split horizon on > >> > that > >> > Cat4 interface... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:43 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> This is vol 2 lab 3 task 3.5: > >> >> > >> >> Configre Rip for R8 and Cat4 on Vlna F. R8 should see the rip routes > >> >> for > >> >> the backbone via Cat4, not directly from bb2. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> My original solution was to build a tunnel between R8 and Cat4 and > run > >> >> rip > >> >> over that, and not on R8's F0/0 interface. That worked but then I > >> >> looked in > >> >> the solution guide to see how they had solved it. The solution guide > >> >> just > >> >> shows them using the distance command and no split horizon, not any > >> >> passive > >> >> interfaces. The solution guide doesn't show any verification for the > >> >> task so > >> >> it is hard to tell how they define "see the rip routes" I had > >> >> interpreted it > >> >> to mean the VIA address in show ip ro. > >> >> R 192.168.3.3 [120/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:19, > FastEthernet0/ > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:57 AM, garry baker <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> to see them as they cam from Cat4? do you mean see the update source > >> >>> as > >> >>> Cat4 'show ip protocol' will show the update source and if you use > >> >>> unicast > >> >>> neighbors (passive default all the intefaces to keep the multicast > >> >>> from > >> >>> working also) with split horizon on Cat4 the updates will pass > through > >> >>> and > >> >>> come from Cat4 but the 'show ip route' will still show the next-hop > as > >> >>> BB3 > >> >>> > >> >>> I do not know of a next-hop-self command for rip, but you could use > a > >> >>> summary address from Cat4? > >> >>> > >> >>> R8#sh ip protocols > >> >>> Routing Protocol is "rip" > >> >>> Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set > >> >>> Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set > >> >>> Sending updates every 30 seconds, next due in 0 seconds > >> >>> Invalid after 180 seconds, hold down 180, flushed after 240 > >> >>> Redistributing: rip > >> >>> Neighbor(s): > >> >>> 110.99.200.40 > >> >>> Default version control: send version 2, receive version 2 > >> >>> Automatic network summarization is not in effect > >> >>> Maximum path: 4 > >> >>> Routing for Networks: > >> >>> 110.0.0.0 > >> >>> Passive Interface(s): > >> >>> FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>> FastEthernet0/1 > >> >>> VoIP-Null0 > >> >>> Routing Information Sources: > >> >>> Gateway Distance Last Update > >> >>> 110.99.200.40 120 00:00:06 > >> >>> Distance: (default is 120) > >> >>> R8#sh ip route > >> >>> Gateway of last resort is not set > >> >>> 110.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets > >> >>> C 110.99.200.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>> 192.168.2.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets > >> >>> R 192.168.2.2 [120/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:19, > >> >>> FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>> 192.168.3.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets > >> >>> R 192.168.3.3 [120/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:19, > >> >>> FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>> > >> >>> Routing table after using ip summary on interface of CAT4: > >> >>> > >> >>> R8#sh ip route > >> >>> Gateway of last resort is not set > >> >>> 110.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets > >> >>> C 110.99.200.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>> R 192.168.2.0/24 [120/2] via 110.99.200.40, 00:00:26, > >> >>> FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>> R 192.168.3.0/24 [120/2] via 110.99.200.40, 00:00:26, > >> >>> FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Garry L. Baker > >> >>> > >> >>> "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:28 AM, marc abel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I have 3 routers/switches participating in rip as in the diagram > >> >>>> attached. The goal is to make R8 see the routes advertised by bb3 > as > >> >>>> if they > >> >>>> are from Cat4. I have disabled split horizon on the CAT4 vlan50 > >> >>>> interface. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Here is my R8 config > >> >>>> > >> >>>> router rip > >> >>>> version 2 > >> >>>> redistribute ospf 1 metric 10 > >> >>>> passive-interface default > >> >>>> no passive-interface FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>>> network 110.0.0.0 > >> >>>> distance 255 > >> >>>> distance 121 110.99.200.22 0.0.0.0 > >> >>>> distance 111 110.99.200.40 0.0.0.0 > >> >>>> no auto-summary > >> >>>> > >> >>>> but when I do a show ip ro rip > >> >>>> > >> >>>> R8(config-router)#do show ip ro rip > >> >>>> 110.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 12 subnets, 4 masks > >> >>>> R 110.99.104.104/32 [111/1] via 110.99.200.40, 00:00:10, > >> >>>> FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>>> 192.168.2.0/32 is subnetted, 4 subnets > >> >>>> R 192.168.2.2 [111/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:10, > >> >>>> FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>>> R 192.168.2.3 [111/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:10, > >> >>>> FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>>> R 192.168.2.1 [111/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:10, > >> >>>> FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>>> R 192.168.2.4 [111/2] via 110.99.200.22, 00:00:10, > >> >>>> FastEthernet0/0 > >> >>>> > >> >>>> What am I missing? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thank you, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Marc > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >> >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >> > please > >> > visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > > >> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
