Another thing to note is there were no routing loops in this network when I
began the ticket. Marko had the same situation on the video solution but
expressed several times that a topology change could trigger a routing loop
depending on how the network converged based on where redistribution was
configured. No where while working on this ticket have I seen output from
'debug ip routing' that would indicate I had a routing loop.

As for Marko's recommendations on tagging everything - check the route-maps
in my earlier email. They match Marko's example in the video solution (and
the redistribution vLecture) 100% aside from the naming convention.


On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes and none of the route-map statements going from EIGRP to OSPF actually
> set the tag to 110. Your RIP to OSPF route-map is the same thing... nothing
> sets the tag to 110.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Jason Maynard 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  I am not following (sorry)
>>
>>
>>
>> Did you read the full route-maps from my original post?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Jay Taylor [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* September-24-10 8:51 PM
>> *To:* Jason Maynard
>> *Cc:* Mark Beynon; [email protected]
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL3-LAB5 - Ticket6
>>
>>
>>
>> With this route-map applied everywhere OSPF is redistributed into EIGRP no
>> routes will ever be tagged with 110.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Jason Maynard <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Lets analyze one example and I will explain where I am coming from
>>
>>
>>
>> OSPF into EIGRP
>>
>>
>>
>> route-map O-E deny 10
>>
>>  match tag 90 (ensures that any route tag anywhere else that matches 90
>> will not be redistributed)
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-E permit 20
>>
>>  match tag 110 (If I have tagged this elsewhere match it, for example the
>> E-O route-map)
>>
>>  set tag 110 (ensure the tag remains and is not overwritten to allow me
>> to make decisions elsewhere is needed)
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-E permit 25
>>
>>  match tag 120 (If I have tagged this elsewhere match it)
>>
>>  set tag 120 (ensure the tag remains and is not overwritten to allow me
>> to make decisions elsewhere is needed)
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-E permit 30
>>
>>  set tag 90 (anything else left must be EIGRP so tag it so I can use the
>> tag elsewhere to make decisions)
>>
>>
>>
>> If I am wrong in my logic please correct me.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Mark Beynon [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* September-24-10 6:33 PM
>> *To:* Jason Maynard
>> *Cc:* [email protected]
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL3-LAB5 - Ticket6
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi jason, I don't have access to the work book right now, but I would
>> suggest there is something omiss with your o-e route map... Please correct
>> if I'm wrong!
>>
>>
>>
>> You start by denying tag 90, good, no eigrp going in to eigrp.
>>
>>
>>
>> You then match ospf tag, and reset ospf tag? Liitle unsure on this,
>> wouldn't expect you to have ospf routes already tag as ospf routes within
>> ospf, but can see is possible. Usually expect this as a catch all last entry
>> with out the match command. Expect you may have two ospf islands for
>> example..
>>
>>
>>
>> You then pass through rip, all fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> But you then at the bottom of your route map, match everything else known
>> in ospf, and tag it as eigrp?? I would expect this to be where you set tag
>> 110...
>>
>> Same concern on your e-o route map
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On 23 Sep 2010, at 15:20, Jason Maynard <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>   Nothing shows on any device (debug ip routing is running)
>>
>>
>>
>>  I really appreciate your feedback as to whether the approach is good and
>> whether or not I should of done things differently.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jason Maynard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>
>> *To:* Jason Maynard <[email protected]>
>> *Cc:* Jason Maynard <[email protected]>; "<
>> [email protected]>" <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Thu, September 23, 2010 9:31:48 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL3-LAB5 - Ticket6
>>
>> I'm in the class just now. I will have to read through the lab and your
>> solution to see.
>>
>>
>>
>> Are there any loops in the network? If not, your solution must be OK.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>>
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>>
>>
>> Free CCIE Training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>>
>>
>>
>> Mailto: [email protected]
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>>
>> Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities
>>
>>
>>
>> :: Sent from my phone. Apologies for errors and brevity. ::
>>
>>
>> On Sep 23, 2010, at 12:15, "Jason Maynard" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Hey guys I  can really use some feedback
>>
>>
>>
>> Marko and/or Tyson can you please provide some feedback?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!!
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason Maynard
>> *Sent:* September-22-10 9:27 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL3-LAB5 - Ticket6
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hey guys can you confirm whether my route-map works and ensures not loops
>> could form. The DSG has allot less configuration but I know Marko has
>> mentioned in his lectures that tags just ensure that loops cannot for even
>> if routing protocols have mechanisms to prevent them. (Marko, I hope I have
>> this right and if not I am sure you will correct me :P )
>>
>>
>>
>> Redistribution and ensure that there is no LOOPs
>>
>>
>>
>> *R4*
>>
>> *__*
>>
>> * *
>>
>> *Protocols EIGRP and OSPF*
>>
>>
>>
>> route-map O-E deny 10
>>
>>  match tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-E permit 20
>>
>>  match tag 110
>>
>>  set tag 110
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-E permit 25
>>
>>  match tag 120
>>
>>  set tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-E permit 30
>>
>>  set tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-O deny 10
>>
>>  match tag 110
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-O permit 20
>>
>>  match tag 90
>>
>>  set tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-O permit 25
>>
>>  match tag 120
>>
>>  set tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-O permit 30
>>
>>  set tag 110
>>
>>
>>
>> *R7*
>>
>> *__*
>>
>> *Protocols EIGRP and OSPF and RIP*
>>
>>
>>
>> route-map O-E deny 10
>>
>>  match tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-E permit 20
>>
>>  match tag 110
>>
>>  set tag 110
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-E permit 25
>>
>>  match tag 120
>>
>>  set tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-E permit 30
>>
>>  set tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-O deny 10
>>
>>  match tag 110
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-O permit 20
>>
>>  match tag 90
>>
>>  set tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-O permit 25
>>
>>  match tag 120
>>
>>  set tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-O permit 30
>>
>>  set tag 110
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-O deny 10
>>
>>  match tag 110
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-O permit 20
>>
>>  match tag 120
>>
>>  set tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-O permit 25
>>
>>  match tag 90
>>
>>  set tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-O permit 30
>>
>>  set tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-R deny 10
>>
>>  match tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-R permit 20
>>
>>  match tag 110
>>
>>  set tag 110
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-R permit 25
>>
>>  match tag 90
>>
>>  set tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map O-R permit 30
>>
>>  set tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-R deny 10
>>
>>  match tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-R permit 20
>>
>>  match tag 90
>>
>>  set tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-R permit 25
>>
>>  match tag 110
>>
>>  set tag 110
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-R permit 30
>>
>>  set tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-E deny 10
>>
>>  match tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-E permit 20
>>
>>  match tag 120
>>
>>  set tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-E permit 25
>>
>>  match tag 110
>>
>>  set tag 110
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-E permit 30
>>
>>  set tag 90
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *R9*
>>
>> *__*
>>
>> * *
>>
>> *Protocols EIGRP and RIP*
>>
>>
>>
>> route-map E-R deny 10
>>
>>  match tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-R permit 20
>>
>>  match tag 90
>>
>>  set tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-R permit 25
>>
>>  match tag 110
>>
>>  set tag 110
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map E-R permit 30
>>
>>  set tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-E deny 10
>>
>>  match tag 90
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-E permit 20
>>
>>  match tag 120
>>
>>  set tag 120
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-E permit 25
>>
>>  match tag 110
>>
>>  set tag 110
>>
>> !
>>
>> route-map R-E permit 30
>>
>>  set tag 90
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to