I've got the same problem for sure... last week in the bootcamp Marko said I really need to quit over-thinking things. I spend a lot of time worrying whether my solution is the 'right' one.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Terry Vinson <[email protected]>wrote: > Thank Jay, nice to know it's not me. I'm more scared of the wording of > an exam question than I am of the technology they are asking about (or > the tech I think they are asking about). I've become pretty paranoid > over the last year or so. lol > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would read the 'manage one-way links' task as requiring aggressive mode > > since it will not actively take down a link without that option being > > enabled. > > > > I would also read that the task requires PAgP based on the wording "can > not > > use an industry standard, but we must make sure these links can negotiate > > their setup" > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Terry Vinson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Section 2.4 > >> > >> Configure any interfaces connecting the switches together to appear as > >> one link to STP per neighbor. > >> If either of the interfaces is damaged, the switches should manage > >> one-way links. Do not use industry > >> standards, but make sure these links can negotiate their setup. > >> > >> The task states that one-way links should be "managed" but the > >> solution guide states: > >> > >> "Finally, turn on UDLD to manage the one-way link detection. There's > >> no mention about anything > >> requiring aggressive mode, so that part is up to you." > >> > >> I guess my question is one regarding wording. The task states that > >> the switches should "manage" one-way > >> links. The prescribed solution seems only informational (at best) and > >> would do nothing to prevent Bridging- > >> Loops. Which I assume is what we are being asked to manage. > >> > >> Additionally, the task states that we can not use an industry > >> standard, but we must make sure these links > >> can "negotiate their setup". > >> > >> But the solution on page 43 states that we "end up either using PAgP > >> or just mode on" > >> > >> I thought that mode "on" didn't allow negotiation, am I incorrect? > >> > >> Any help/thoughts would be appreciated. > >> > >> Terry > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > >> visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > > > > -- > Favorite Quote: > "What you do not know doing will quickly teach you." > -- Master Po >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
