Hi Marc, It will be transparent as the routers will already have the OSPF routes "hidden" by the static routes.
For your info, OSPF AD is 110. :-) Christophe On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:10 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like to implement OSPF on a network that currently has static routes > everywhere. If I bring up the ospf routes (AD 90) behind the static routes > (AD 1) and get all the ospf processes converged will there be any period of > un-reachability when I remove the static routes and let it fall back to the > OSPF routes? Does it take a couple seconds for the router to begin using the > OSPF routes or should this be a transparent change? > > Thanks in advance, > > Marc > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
