Thank you for your reply. Sorry not enough coffee this morning, of course ospf is AD 110.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Christophe Lemaire < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marc, > > It will be transparent as the routers will already have the OSPF > routes "hidden" by the static routes. > > For your info, OSPF AD is 110. :-) > > Christophe > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:10 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would like to implement OSPF on a network that currently has static > routes > > everywhere. If I bring up the ospf routes (AD 90) behind the static > routes > > (AD 1) and get all the ospf processes converged will there be any period > of > > un-reachability when I remove the static routes and let it fall back to > the > > OSPF routes? Does it take a couple seconds for the router to begin using > the > > OSPF routes or should this be a transparent change? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Marc > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
