How would you do this in a route-map without an ACL? When I read that part of the lab, I was like.... uhh.... what?
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > To me, the wording of 'Do not use any routefiltering ACLs' part means don't > call them directly in a distribute or offset list. > > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:20 AM, David Betz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I was reading the first lab in the Cisco Press CCIE R&S Practice Lab book >> the other day and saw the following in the IGP section, EIGRP sub-section: >> >> Ensure that R4 does not install any of the EIGRP Loopback routes from any >> of the switches into its routing table; >> as such these routes should also not be present in the OSPF network post >> redistribution. Do not use any routefiltering ACLs, prefix lists, or admin >> distance manipulation to achieve this, and perform configuration only on >> R4. (3 points) >> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Combatant 101 <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi Guys / Marko, >>> >>> >>> >>> I find Marko’s vLecture on Routing Protocol Redistribution the most time >>> efficient and easy method for IGP Redistribution. >>> >>> >>> >>> What I would like to know is, has Cisco ever stated in the lab for IGP >>> Redistribution (specifically) that route-maps and / or tags are not >>> permitted? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Combatant101 >>> >>> >>> >>> http://myitgeekblog.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
