Nope, you don't need ACLs :-) route-map RedistAndTag match interface ... set tag ... ! router ... redist connected route-map RedistAndTag ... !
Later on you can filter based on tags - no ACLs of any sort. -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture Mailto: [email protected] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 16:46, David Betz <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, this would be to apply the tags. For that I would need an access-list, > yes? This is definitely where I would have to ask the Proctor to clarify > what it means, because I think I'm reading it differently than you. > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Using tags :-) >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >> >> Mailto: [email protected] >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 16:09, David Betz <[email protected]> wrote: >> > How would you do this in a route-map without an ACL? When I read that >> > part >> > of the lab, I was like.... uhh.... what? >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> To me, the wording of 'Do not use any routefiltering ACLs' part means >> >> don't call them directly in a distribute or offset list. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:20 AM, David Betz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I was reading the first lab in the Cisco Press CCIE R&S Practice Lab >> >>> book >> >>> the other day and saw the following in the IGP section, EIGRP >> >>> sub-section: >> >>> Ensure that R4 does not install any of the EIGRP Loopback routes from >> >>> any >> >>> of the switches into its routing table; >> >>> as such these routes should also not be present in the OSPF network >> >>> post >> >>> redistribution. Do not use any routefiltering ACLs, prefix lists, or >> >>> admin >> >>> distance manipulation to achieve this, and perform configuration only >> >>> on >> >>> R4. (3 points) >> >>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Combatant 101 <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi Guys / Marko, >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I find Marko’s vLecture on Routing Protocol Redistribution the most >> >>>> time >> >>>> efficient and easy method for IGP Redistribution. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> What I would like to know is, has Cisco ever stated in the lab for >> >>>> IGP >> >>>> Redistribution (specifically) that route-maps and / or tags are not >> >>>> permitted? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Combatant101 >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> http://myitgeekblog.wordpress.com/ >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >>> please >> >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> > please >> > visit www.ipexpert.com >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
