Can someone clarify to what extent L2TPv3 and/or L2VPN is covered on the R&S
lab? I dont see it on the Blueprint however it's covered in Volume 2.
Also when specifying the encapsulation type for the pseudowire-class, when is
it appropriate to use l2tpv3 as opposed to MPLS. My thinking is MPLS
encapsulation is only for PE-to-PE but I'm not sure.
Thanks for any help.
From: [email protected]
Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 61, Issue 9
To: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:16:50 -0500
Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..."
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:50:59 -0500
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
LOL
While IPv6 solves some of the issues with IPv4 I still can't get used to it. I
understand it's inevitability, and there is nothing I can do about it, but I
still love IPv4! I mean, at least with IPv4 I can remember the ip addresses of
most of the critical network gear at work, not so with IPv6. With IPv6 I can't
even remember one address, it just seems like total nonsense to me. Maybe one
day when I've seen it in action on a live network I will feel differently, at
least I hope so...
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:51 PM
To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected]; Mesikoo Kamali; CCIE
OSL
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
IPv6 is far easier to work with!
I'm glad v4 is gone. No one wants to move to v6 so it means I can sit on my
arse all day and do nothing now.
Sent from my BlackBerry(r) from Optus
-----Original Message-----
From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:47:20
To: Mesikoo Kamali<[email protected]>;
[email protected]<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
Soon we'll have ipv6 only CCIE labs.... Yuck!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo Kamali
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
Hi guys,
This is a little late but figured it was news worthy.
https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html
/cheers
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:57:28 -0500
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
No sense getting your hopes up as we will be supporting IPv4 networks for
some time. The migration will take years.......and even then there is no
guarantee that companies will move off of IPv4 internally (at least nothing
that I see is indicating such)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Max Pierson
Sent: February-04-11 9:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; CCIE OSL
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
lmao, +1
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:51 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> IPv6 is far easier to work with!
>
> I'm glad v4 is gone. No one wants to move to v6 so it means I can sit on
my
> arse all day and do nothing now.
>
> Sent from my BlackBerryR from Optus
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:47:20
> To: Mesikoo Kamali<[email protected]>; [email protected]<
> [email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>
> Soon we'll have ipv6 only CCIE labs.... Yuck!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo Kamali
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> This is a little late but figured it was news worthy.
>
>
>
> https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html
>
>
>
> /cheers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
> attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may
> contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
> use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If
this
> was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
> destroy all copies of the original message.
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:07:48 +1100
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
Thats what DNS is for. :)
AAAA
Seriously though, the only IPv4 address I have ever remembered in my
whole life is 4.2.2.2 so having a string 128 bits long vs 32 bits long
makes no difference to me. Subnetting and summarisation are far
easier with v6 (all you need to do is look, as it is all divisible by
two unlike v4). I also cant decode hex without a calculator and you
really dont need to. Just look at where the numbers are different in
your addresses and thats it.
Cheers,
Matt
CCIE #22386
CCSI #31207
On 5 February 2011 15:50, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
> LOL
>
> While IPv6 solves some of the issues with IPv4 I still can't get used to it.
> I understand it's inevitability, and there is nothing I can do about it, but
> I still love IPv4! I mean, at least with IPv4 I can remember the ip
> addresses of most of the critical network gear at work, not so with IPv6.
> With IPv6 I can't even remember one address, it just seems like total
> nonsense to me. Maybe one day when I've seen it in action on a live network
> I will feel differently, at least I hope so...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:51 PM
> To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected]; Mesikoo Kamali; CCIE
> OSL
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>
> IPv6 is far easier to work with!
>
> I'm glad v4 is gone. No one wants to move to v6 so it means I can sit on my
> arse all day and do nothing now.
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry(r) from Optus
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:47:20
> To: Mesikoo Kamali<[email protected]>;
> [email protected]<[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>
> Soon we'll have ipv6 only CCIE labs.... Yuck!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo Kamali
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> This is a little late but figured it was news worthy.
>
>
>
> https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html
>
>
>
> /cheers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain
> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was
> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies of the original message.
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain
> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was
> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies of the original message.
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:08:07 -0500
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
Now if only our Cisco routers dynamically registered their hostnames as a AAAA
records within DNS!
I suppose I'm being a little hard on IPv6 so let's be honest here. I hate
change!
Thank you.
Steve Di Bias
Network Engineer - Information Systems
Valley Health System - Las Vegas
Office - 702- 369-7594
Cell - 702-241-1801
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Hill [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:08 PM
To: Di Bias, Steve
Cc: [email protected]; Mesikoo Kamali; CCIE OSL
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
Thats what DNS is for. :)
AAAA
Seriously though, the only IPv4 address I have ever remembered in my whole life
is 4.2.2.2 so having a string 128 bits long vs 32 bits long makes no difference
to me. Subnetting and summarisation are far easier with v6 (all you need to do
is look, as it is all divisible by two unlike v4). I also cant decode hex
without a calculator and you really dont need to. Just look at where the
numbers are different in your addresses and thats it.
Cheers,
Matt
CCIE #22386
CCSI #31207
On 5 February 2011 15:50, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
> LOL
>
> While IPv6 solves some of the issues with IPv4 I still can't get used to it.
> I understand it's inevitability, and there is nothing I can do about it, but
> I still love IPv4! I mean, at least with IPv4 I can remember the ip
> addresses of most of the critical network gear at work, not so with IPv6.
> With IPv6 I can't even remember one address, it just seems like total
> nonsense to me. Maybe one day when I've seen it in action on a live network
> I will feel differently, at least I hope so...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:51 PM
> To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected]; Mesikoo
> Kamali; CCIE OSL
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>
> IPv6 is far easier to work with!
>
> I'm glad v4 is gone. No one wants to move to v6 so it means I can sit on my
> arse all day and do nothing now.
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry(r) from Optus
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:47:20
> To: Mesikoo Kamali<[email protected]>;
> [email protected]<[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>
> Soon we'll have ipv6 only CCIE labs.... Yuck!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo
> Kamali
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> This is a little late but figured it was news worthy.
>
>
>
> https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html
>
>
>
> /cheers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain
> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was
> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies of the original message.
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain
> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was
> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies of the original message.
UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:16:47 +1100
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
Less than 10 years ago we all needed to worry about rubbish like IPX,
LAT and SNA.
I didnt mind throwing those out the window to spend more time on IP.
Especially when we had networks which would use two or more protocols
concurrently.
Bring on the superior protocol that has been designed from the ground
up with the lessons learned from the past.
Cheers,
Matt
CCIE #22386
CCSI #31207
On 5 February 2011 17:08, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now if only our Cisco routers dynamically registered their hostnames as a
> AAAA records within DNS!
>
> I suppose I'm being a little hard on IPv6 so let's be honest here. I hate
> change!
>
> Thank you.
>
> Steve Di Bias
> Network Engineer - Information Systems
> Valley Health System - Las Vegas
> Office - 702- 369-7594
> Cell - 702-241-1801
> [email protected]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Hill [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:08 PM
> To: Di Bias, Steve
> Cc: [email protected]; Mesikoo Kamali; CCIE OSL
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>
> Thats what DNS is for. :)
>
> AAAA
>
> Seriously though, the only IPv4 address I have ever remembered in my whole
> life is 4.2.2.2 so having a string 128 bits long vs 32 bits long makes no
> difference to me. Subnetting and summarisation are far easier with v6 (all
> you need to do is look, as it is all divisible by two unlike v4). I also
> cant decode hex without a calculator and you really dont need to. Just look
> at where the numbers are different in your addresses and thats it.
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
>
> CCIE #22386
> CCSI #31207
>
> On 5 February 2011 15:50, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
>> LOL
>>
>> While IPv6 solves some of the issues with IPv4 I still can't get used to it.
>> I understand it's inevitability, and there is nothing I can do about it, but
>> I still love IPv4! I mean, at least with IPv4 I can remember the ip
>> addresses of most of the critical network gear at work, not so with IPv6.
>> With IPv6 I can't even remember one address, it just seems like total
>> nonsense to me. Maybe one day when I've seen it in action on a live network
>> I will feel differently, at least I hope so...
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:51 PM
>> To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected]; Mesikoo
>> Kamali; CCIE OSL
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>>
>> IPv6 is far easier to work with!
>>
>> I'm glad v4 is gone. No one wants to move to v6 so it means I can sit on my
>> arse all day and do nothing now.
>>
>> Sent from my BlackBerry(r) from Optus
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]>
>> Sender: [email protected]
>> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:47:20
>> To: Mesikoo Kamali<[email protected]>;
>> [email protected]<[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>>
>> Soon we'll have ipv6 only CCIE labs.... Yuck!
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo
>> Kamali
>> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a little late but figured it was news worthy.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html
>>
>>
>>
>> /cheers
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain
>> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
>> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was
>> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
>> all copies of the original message.
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain
>> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
>> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was
>> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
>> all copies of the original message.
>
>
> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain
> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was
> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies of the original message.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
