Brian, To my knowledge it is not on the exam. Thus the workbook covers it just in case. But I see it as a very low probability as they said on R&S CCIE Ask the Expert that it is not covered.
Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: [email protected] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of brian russell Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 5:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] L2TPv3 L2VPN Can someone clarify to what extent L2TPv3 and/or L2VPN is covered on the R&S lab? I dont see it on the Blueprint however it's covered in Volume 2. Also when specifying the encapsulation type for the pseudowire-class, when is it appropriate to use l2tpv3 as opposed to MPLS. My thinking is MPLS encapsulation is only for PE-to-PE but I'm not sure. Thanks for any help. From: [email protected] Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 61, Issue 9 To: [email protected] Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:16:50 -0500 Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." --Forwarded Message Attachment-- From: [email protected] To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:50:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space LOL While IPv6 solves some of the issues with IPv4 I still can't get used to it. I understand it's inevitability, and there is nothing I can do about it, but I still love IPv4! I mean, at least with IPv4 I can remember the ip addresses of most of the critical network gear at work, not so with IPv6. With IPv6 I can't even remember one address, it just seems like total nonsense to me. Maybe one day when I've seen it in action on a live network I will feel differently, at least I hope so... -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:51 PM To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected]; Mesikoo Kamali; CCIE OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space IPv6 is far easier to work with! I'm glad v4 is gone. No one wants to move to v6 so it means I can sit on my arse all day and do nothing now. Sent from my BlackBerry(r) from Optus -----Original Message----- From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:47:20 To: Mesikoo Kamali<[email protected]>; [email protected]<[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space Soon we'll have ipv6 only CCIE labs.... Yuck! -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo Kamali Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space Hi guys, This is a little late but figured it was news worthy. https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html /cheers _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --Forwarded Message Attachment-- From: [email protected] CC: [email protected]; [email protected] To: [email protected]; [email protected] Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:57:28 -0500 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space No sense getting your hopes up as we will be supporting IPv4 networks for some time. The migration will take years.......and even then there is no guarantee that companies will move off of IPv4 internally (at least nothing that I see is indicating such) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Max Pierson Sent: February-04-11 9:53 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; CCIE OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space lmao, +1 On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:51 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > IPv6 is far easier to work with! > > I'm glad v4 is gone. No one wants to move to v6 so it means I can sit on my > arse all day and do nothing now. > > Sent from my BlackBerryR from Optus > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:47:20 > To: Mesikoo Kamali<[email protected]>; [email protected]< > [email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space > > Soon we'll have ipv6 only CCIE labs.... Yuck! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo Kamali > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space > > Hi guys, > > > > This is a little late but figured it was news worthy. > > > > https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html > > > > /cheers > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, > use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this > was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > destroy all copies of the original message. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com --Forwarded Message Attachment-- From: [email protected] CC: [email protected]; [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:07:48 +1100 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space Thats what DNS is for. :) AAAA Seriously though, the only IPv4 address I have ever remembered in my whole life is 4.2.2.2 so having a string 128 bits long vs 32 bits long makes no difference to me. Subnetting and summarisation are far easier with v6 (all you need to do is look, as it is all divisible by two unlike v4). I also cant decode hex without a calculator and you really dont need to. Just look at where the numbers are different in your addresses and thats it. Cheers, Matt CCIE #22386 CCSI #31207 On 5 February 2011 15:50, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > LOL > > While IPv6 solves some of the issues with IPv4 I still can't get used to it. I understand it's inevitability, and there is nothing I can do about it, but I still love IPv4! I mean, at least with IPv4 I can remember the ip addresses of most of the critical network gear at work, not so with IPv6. With IPv6 I can't even remember one address, it just seems like total nonsense to me. Maybe one day when I've seen it in action on a live network I will feel differently, at least I hope so... > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:51 PM > To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected]; Mesikoo Kamali; CCIE OSL > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space > > IPv6 is far easier to work with! > > I'm glad v4 is gone. No one wants to move to v6 so it means I can sit on my arse all day and do nothing now. > > Sent from my BlackBerry(r) from Optus > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:47:20 > To: Mesikoo Kamali<[email protected]>; [email protected]<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space > > Soon we'll have ipv6 only CCIE labs.... Yuck! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo Kamali > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space > > Hi guys, > > > > This is a little late but figured it was news worthy. > > > > https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html > > > > /cheers > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --Forwarded Message Attachment-- From: [email protected] CC: [email protected]; [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:08:07 -0500 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space Now if only our Cisco routers dynamically registered their hostnames as a AAAA records within DNS! I suppose I'm being a little hard on IPv6 so let's be honest here. I hate change! Thank you. Steve Di Bias Network Engineer - Information Systems Valley Health System - Las Vegas Office - 702- 369-7594 Cell - 702-241-1801 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Matt Hill [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:08 PM To: Di Bias, Steve Cc: [email protected]; Mesikoo Kamali; CCIE OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space Thats what DNS is for. :) AAAA Seriously though, the only IPv4 address I have ever remembered in my whole life is 4.2.2.2 so having a string 128 bits long vs 32 bits long makes no difference to me. Subnetting and summarisation are far easier with v6 (all you need to do is look, as it is all divisible by two unlike v4). I also cant decode hex without a calculator and you really dont need to. Just look at where the numbers are different in your addresses and thats it. Cheers, Matt CCIE #22386 CCSI #31207 On 5 February 2011 15:50, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > LOL > > While IPv6 solves some of the issues with IPv4 I still can't get used to it. I understand it's inevitability, and there is nothing I can do about it, but I still love IPv4! I mean, at least with IPv4 I can remember the ip addresses of most of the critical network gear at work, not so with IPv6. With IPv6 I can't even remember one address, it just seems like total nonsense to me. Maybe one day when I've seen it in action on a live network I will feel differently, at least I hope so... > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:51 PM > To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected]; Mesikoo > Kamali; CCIE OSL > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space > > IPv6 is far easier to work with! > > I'm glad v4 is gone. No one wants to move to v6 so it means I can sit on my arse all day and do nothing now. > > Sent from my BlackBerry(r) from Optus > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:47:20 > To: Mesikoo Kamali<[email protected]>; > [email protected]<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space > > Soon we'll have ipv6 only CCIE labs.... Yuck! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo > Kamali > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space > > Hi guys, > > > > This is a little late but figured it was news worthy. > > > > https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html > > > > /cheers > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --Forwarded Message Attachment-- From: [email protected] CC: [email protected]; [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:16:47 +1100 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space Less than 10 years ago we all needed to worry about rubbish like IPX, LAT and SNA. I didnt mind throwing those out the window to spend more time on IP. Especially when we had networks which would use two or more protocols concurrently. Bring on the superior protocol that has been designed from the ground up with the lessons learned from the past. Cheers, Matt CCIE #22386 CCSI #31207 On 5 February 2011 17:08, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > Now if only our Cisco routers dynamically registered their hostnames as a AAAA records within DNS! > > I suppose I'm being a little hard on IPv6 so let's be honest here. I hate change! > > Thank you. > > Steve Di Bias > Network Engineer - Information Systems > Valley Health System - Las Vegas > Office - 702- 369-7594 > Cell - 702-241-1801 > [email protected] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Hill [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:08 PM > To: Di Bias, Steve > Cc: [email protected]; Mesikoo Kamali; CCIE OSL > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space > > Thats what DNS is for. :) > > AAAA > > Seriously though, the only IPv4 address I have ever remembered in my whole life is 4.2.2.2 so having a string 128 bits long vs 32 bits long makes no difference to me. Subnetting and summarisation are far easier with v6 (all you need to do is look, as it is all divisible by two unlike v4). I also cant decode hex without a calculator and you really dont need to. Just look at where the numbers are different in your addresses and thats it. > > Cheers, > Matt > > CCIE #22386 > CCSI #31207 > > On 5 February 2011 15:50, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: >> LOL >> >> While IPv6 solves some of the issues with IPv4 I still can't get used to it. I understand it's inevitability, and there is nothing I can do about it, but I still love IPv4! I mean, at least with IPv4 I can remember the ip addresses of most of the critical network gear at work, not so with IPv6. With IPv6 I can't even remember one address, it just seems like total nonsense to me. Maybe one day when I've seen it in action on a live network I will feel differently, at least I hope so... >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:51 PM >> To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected]; Mesikoo >> Kamali; CCIE OSL >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space >> >> IPv6 is far easier to work with! >> >> I'm glad v4 is gone. No one wants to move to v6 so it means I can sit on my arse all day and do nothing now. >> >> Sent from my BlackBerry(r) from Optus >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> >> Sender: [email protected] >> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:47:20 >> To: Mesikoo Kamali<[email protected]>; >> [email protected]<[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space >> >> Soon we'll have ipv6 only CCIE labs.... Yuck! >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo >> Kamali >> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space >> >> Hi guys, >> >> >> >> This is a little late but figured it was news worthy. >> >> >> >> https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html >> >> >> >> /cheers >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
