The way I look at IPv6 is it gives us more Job opportunity during the migration and upgrade. So it is good
On 2/5/11, Mesikoo Kamali <[email protected]> wrote: > I am personally happy with the change. As an ISP we are always short on IPs > and can't ever get them fast enough. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Hill [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 10:17 PM > To: Di Bias, Steve > Cc: [email protected]; Mesikoo Kamali; CCIE OSL > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space > > Less than 10 years ago we all needed to worry about rubbish like IPX, LAT > and SNA. > > I didnt mind throwing those out the window to spend more time on IP. > Especially when we had networks which would use two or more protocols > concurrently. > > Bring on the superior protocol that has been designed from the ground up > with the lessons learned from the past. > > Cheers, > Matt > > CCIE #22386 > CCSI #31207 > > On 5 February 2011 17:08, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: >> Now if only our Cisco routers dynamically registered their hostnames as a > AAAA records within DNS! >> >> I suppose I'm being a little hard on IPv6 so let's be honest here. I hate > change! >> >> Thank you. >> >> Steve Di Bias >> Network Engineer - Information Systems Valley Health System - Las >> Vegas Office - 702- 369-7594 Cell - 702-241-1801 >> [email protected] >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Matt Hill [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:08 PM >> To: Di Bias, Steve >> Cc: [email protected]; Mesikoo Kamali; CCIE OSL >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space >> >> Thats what DNS is for. :) >> >> AAAA >> >> Seriously though, the only IPv4 address I have ever remembered in my whole > life is 4.2.2.2 so having a string 128 bits long vs 32 bits long makes no > difference to me. Subnetting and summarisation are far easier with v6 (all > you need to do is look, as it is all divisible by two unlike v4). I also > cant decode hex without a calculator and you really dont need to. Just look > at where the numbers are different in your addresses and thats it. >> >> Cheers, >> Matt >> >> CCIE #22386 >> CCSI #31207 >> >> On 5 February 2011 15:50, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: >>> LOL >>> >>> While IPv6 solves some of the issues with IPv4 I still can't get used to > it. I understand it's inevitability, and there is nothing I can do about it, > but I still love IPv4! I mean, at least with IPv4 I can remember the ip > addresses of most of the critical network gear at work, not so with IPv6. > With IPv6 I can't even remember one address, it just seems like total > nonsense to me. Maybe one day when I've seen it in action on a live network > I will feel differently, at least I hope so... >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:51 PM >>> To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected]; Mesikoo >>> Kamali; CCIE OSL >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space >>> >>> IPv6 is far easier to work with! >>> >>> I'm glad v4 is gone. No one wants to move to v6 so it means I can sit on > my arse all day and do nothing now. >>> >>> Sent from my BlackBerry(r) from Optus >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> >>> Sender: [email protected] >>> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:47:20 >>> To: Mesikoo Kamali<[email protected]>; >>> [email protected]<[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space >>> >>> Soon we'll have ipv6 only CCIE labs.... Yuck! >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo >>> Kamali >>> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:04 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPv4 address space >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> >>> >>> This is a little late but figured it was news worthy. >>> >>> >>> >>> https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html >>> >>> >>> >>> /cheers >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> >>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, > use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this > was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > destroy all copies of the original message. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> >>> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, > use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this > was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > destroy all copies of the original message. >> >> >> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, > use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this > was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and > destroy all copies of the original message. > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > -- Sent from my mobile device Thank you Patrick Song CCIE #28023, CCVP M.Eng in Telecommunications Cell:1-647-868-2950 _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
