Luckily Proctorlabs has a remote controlled power supply but since the lab
does not I would recommend knowing how to both boot and reload from rommon.


On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> That's what we do in ProctorLabs every day, I'm afraid :-)
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: [email protected]
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:30, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Reboot it until it does.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:59 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> So what do you do when the router can't see the flash?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > It's a complaint about R2 in ProctorLabs, which has chronic problem of
>>> > sometimes not booting and requiring either to be initialized or power
>>> cycled
>>> > to do so.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>>> > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>> >
>>> > FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>>> >
>>> > Mailto: [email protected]
>>> > Telephone: <%2B1.810.326.1444> <%2B1.810.326.1444>+1.810.326.1444
>>> > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:19, Liqua <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Congrats - Nice write up, plus you deserve a beer or two after that.
>>> >>
>>> >> Perhaps being dumb (and hope it's not NDA) but what does "had a router
>>> pull
>>> >> an 'R2' on me" mean please ?  What's an R2 ?
>>> >>
>>> >> Liqua.
>>> >>
>>> >> --- On Wed, 16/3/11, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> From: Jay Taylor <[email protected]>
>>> >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Lab experience
>>> >> To: "CCIE OSL" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>> >> Date: Wednesday, 16 March, 2011, 15:41
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Pi day (3/14) was good to me; I passed the routing and switching lab
>>> to get
>>> >> my digits! CCIE #28391
>>> >>
>>> >> I stayed at Comfort Suites this time rather than the Wingate next door
>>> and
>>> >> was happy I switched. Much nicer hotel - cleaner/newer room, better
>>> >> breakfast and free beer from 5-7pm (Mon, Tue and Wed only I think.)
>>> They
>>> >> will shuttle you to other nearby places but I didn't ask about the
>>> lab.
>>> >> Regardless, I recommend renting a car so you don't have to rely on
>>> someone
>>> >> else on such an important day.
>>> >>
>>> >> Overall I felt my lab this time was more difficult than last time but
>>> I was
>>> >> more prepared. Strange how a day can feel like it is dragging on
>>> forever
>>> >> yet
>>> >> going by so quickly at the same time. I felt much more rushed on this
>>> >> attempt and was very aware of the clock throughout the whole day. For
>>> my
>>> >> last attempt I also said that I was having fun for about 75% of the
>>> day and
>>> >> that was not the case this time. I had a number of times during the
>>> day
>>> >> where I was rather stressed about either mistakes I'd made or not
>>> being
>>> >> able
>>> >> to think through the solution I wanted to use.
>>> >>
>>> >> I struggled more with the troubleshooting section this time than
>>> before and
>>> >> ended with only 2-3 minutes to spare (after 1 round of verifying all
>>> the
>>> >> tickets at the end.) One good thing about the TS section now is Cisco
>>> is
>>> >> VERY clear about what you need to accomplish in order to consider a
>>> ticket
>>> >> solved. Even so, there were a couple tickets that I felt I made too
>>> drastic
>>> >> of changes to fix the problem and wasn't sure if I'd get the points
>>> for
>>> >> them. Even though my solution matched the output they wanted I
>>> wouldn't be
>>> >> surprised at all if I missed points on those.
>>> >>
>>> >> Config section was more complicated than my first attempt but there
>>> was
>>> >> nothing in there that I had absolutely no idea how to accomplish.
>>> There
>>> >> were
>>> >> several topics I needed help from the DocCD and I asked the proctor
>>> quite a
>>> >> few questions again. I got off to a fairly slow start and by lunchtime
>>> >> wasn't even done with IGP config. After lunch it felt like things were
>>> just
>>> >> getting worse as I struggled with a couple sections and started making
>>> some
>>> >> really stupid typos. In the end I had to scrap all my BGP config and
>>> start
>>> >> over due to non-technical mistakes. By then I was freaking out pretty
>>> bad
>>> >> and before starting BGP over I took a bathroom break and tried to
>>> 'reset'
>>> >> myself. I pushed through the rest of the routing config and by the
>>> time I
>>> >> started on services and misc topics I didn't think I had enough time
>>> to
>>> >> finish. Somehow I was able to knock all those tasks out in a pretty
>>> short
>>> >> amount of time and still had an hour left to verify. Line by line I
>>> went
>>> >> through the entire lab and verified points for each section. In the
>>> end
>>> >> there were a couple tasks that I wasn't sure if I'd get points for but
>>> the
>>> >> rest I felt very good about. I did go back and change a few things in
>>> that
>>> >> last hour and had a freak out moment in the last 15 minutes when I
>>> couldn't
>>> >> get something working again that I tried to fix. That last change took
>>> me
>>> >> right up until the last 5 minutes.
>>> >>
>>> >> You hear it all the time from IPexpert instructors and I can't stress
>>> this
>>> >> enough - READ THE ENTIRE LAB BEFORE YOU START. Tasks at the end can
>>> have a
>>> >> big impact on how you do things early on. If you don't read the whole
>>> thing
>>> >> you will likely be rebuilding some of the basics to allow later tasks
>>> to
>>> >> work correctly.
>>> >>
>>> >> Two things that stood out to me about my lab day:
>>> >>
>>> >>    1. Had a router pull an 'R2' on me twice throughout the day when I
>>> >>    rebooted it. The proctor was clear that this was my problem to fix
>>> even
>>> >> when
>>> >>    the router didn't recognize it's flash memory.
>>> >>    2. A task was worded using KB for a function that clearly required
>>> Kb. I
>>> >>    asked the proctor a couple times and she insisted that I should
>>> >> configure it
>>> >>    as if it requested Kb. I almost started the task by converting
>>> bytes to
>>> >> bits
>>> >>    and that would have been completely wrong based on what I was told.
>>> >> After
>>> >>    the lab she agreed with me that the lab wording is misleading.
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please
>>> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please
>>> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> >>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to