Hi Nilesh,

>From my point of view you should just use default eigrp "auto summary" on R9
and R6 will see just one summary route (140.10.0.0/16.)
I do not know if restriction not to use "summary-address"means just ip
summary-address eigrp or auto-summary as well :)

Regs,
Ivan



On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Adam Booth <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Nilesh,
>
> Maybe create the summary using a static route to null0, redistribute that
> into EIGRP and use an outbound offset list that will make the contributing
> routes to the summary so high that they appear to be infinite as far as the
> neighbors are concerned?
>
> Cheers,
> Adam
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Nilesh Mehta <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> > I have router R6 and R9 connected through multilink ppp interface and
> EIGRP
> > is running between R6 and R9.
> >
> > I have following loop back int on R9.
> >
> > int lo 9
> > ip add 140.10.8.9 255.255.255.0
> >
> > int lo 10
> > ip add 140.10.10.9 255.255.255.0
> >
> > int lo 11
> > ip add 140.10.11.9 255.255.255.0
> >
> > Now requirement is that R6 should see only single route for this 3 loop
> > backs but We are not allowed to use any distribute-list or filter list or
> > summary-address command.
> > Can any one let me know how we can do this with out breaking
> restrictions?
> > what would be configuration on R9 ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Nilesh
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to