Hey Marc, I cannot see any reason as to why we cannot group R5 and R6 together? I looked through this entire lab and I'm just not seeing it.
Marko??? Thank you, Steve Di Bias Network Engineer - Information Systems Valley Health System - Las Vegas Office - 702- 369-7594 Cell - 702-241-1801 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of marc abel Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:28 AM To: Samir Idris; [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] BGP - volume 1; lab 13 Yes that should work and now that I am looking at this again, I remember the same confusion. Looking at the solution guide I see: "We can have two peers in a sub-AS without doing a mesh. But having read ahead and knowing the upcoming requirements we are going to do three sub-AS's for 109." I can't spot which upcoming requirement makes this clear, can anyone else? On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Samir Idris <[email protected]> wrote: > Well yes 1 ebgp and 1 ibgp. > > If we use two sub-AS and make R2 peer using ibgp with R4 and EBGP with R5. > Let R5 and R6 be in another sub-AS. We are not using OSPF/EIGRP as an IGP > so I don't see the hub-spoke issue out here. > > So there you go. I see two sub-as enough. > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:48 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I assume you are talking about task 13.1 - 13.2 correct? It's been a >> while since I did this lab but it seems like R2 is the Hub in a hub >> and spoke frame network. You have the restrictions that R2 is allowed >> one iBGP and one eBGP peering. >> >> So how would you meet those requirements with only 2 sub AS's? >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Samir Idris <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Everyone, >> > >> > In volume 1; lab 13 I ended up using confederation but with two private >> > AS, >> > however in the solution guide it uses three and I am failing to >> > understand >> > "why". Can anyone help me out here? Thanks. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Samir. >> > >> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:39 PM, >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> >> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >> >> >> >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> >> >> 1. Re: GNS3 Connection Lost ([email protected]) >> >> 2. Re: OSPF SHAMLinks (Jason Maynard) >> >> 3. Re: GNS3 Connection Lost (Vladimir Osipenko) >> >> 4. Re: GNS3 Connection Lost (Vladimir Osipenko) >> >> 5. Re: OSPF SHAMLinks (Jason Maynard) >> >> 6. Re: BGP update source (Vladimir Osipenko) >> >> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> Message: 1 >> >> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 20:10:51 +0100 >> >> From: [email protected] >> >> To: <[email protected]> >> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] GNS3 Connection Lost >> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed >> >> >> >> I had the same problem and I couldn't figure out what the issue was. I >> >> had to create the topology from the scratch. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Lukasz >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:04:47 -0700, Max Kamali wrote: >> >> > try putting the BB routers on a different hyporvisor. I notice the >> >> > same error when trying to start more than 9 virtual routers. >> >> > >> >> > -masiko >> >> > >> >> > On May 23, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Jabran Javaid wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello friends, >> >> >> >> >> >> i am having an error on GNS3 "Connection Lost" while i execute one >> >> >> of the internet toplogies 5.00 version of gns3. >> >> >> BB1 , BB2 and BB3 doesnot start and i receive error in GNS3 as >> >> >> connection lost. >> >> >> kindly assist >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Jabran Javaid >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> > please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > >> >> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Message: 2 >> >> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:59:28 -0400 >> >> From: "Jason Maynard" <[email protected]> >> >> To: "'Combatant 101'" <[email protected]>, "'Nicolas Bellenbaum'" >> >> <[email protected]> >> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF SHAMLinks >> >> Message-ID: <018601cc1983$ecc93040$c65b90c0$@[email protected]> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> >> >> I cannot get it to work....Do you see any issue with the configuration >> >> - I >> >> am at the point to say it is a GNS3 issue but would like to confirm the >> >> configuration >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: [email protected] >> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Combatant 101 >> >> Sent: May-23-11 2:53 PM >> >> To: Nicolas Bellenbaum >> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF SHAMLinks >> >> >> >> Funnily enough when I block the loopbacks of Sham going into OSPF it >> >> kills >> >> my sham link altogether! >> >> >> >> The only way I seem to fix this is by doing a no area x sham-link etc >> >> etc >> >> and then putting the sham-link command back in and poof it all >> >> workings. >> >> >> >> This has been the case several times! >> >> >> >> Haven't really bothered to investigate why but this solution works for >> >> me >> >> on >> >> physical and GNS3 >> >> >> >> HTH >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone 4 >> >> >> >> On 23 May 2011, at 10:03, Nicolas Bellenbaum <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I've had issues when i block both loopbacks from being redistributed >> >> > into >> >> OSPF. When i only filtered the loopback local to the PE from being >> >> redistributed into OSPF the sham link came up with no issue. >> >> > >> >> > Nick >> >> > >> >> > On May 23, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Jason Maynard wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> I thought I would run this by the group as I am not getting the >> >> >> expected >> >> >> results in GNS3. Is there anything that I am missing when creating >> >> >> shamlinks? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 1. Create a loopback with a /32 address on PE Routers >> >> >> >> >> >> 2. Add these loopbacks to the VRF >> >> >> >> >> >> 3. Advertise these loopbacks into the vrf address-family in BGP (Do >> >> >> advertise these networks in OSPF) >> >> >> >> >> >> 4. Create a shamlink in the OSPF vrf process >> >> >> >> >> >> 5. Ensure /32 loopback addresses create above are not advertised in >> >> >> OSPF >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Complete Configuration (I only included the relevant information and >> >> >> it >> >> is >> >> >> assumed the you have an already functioning MPLS network) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> PE1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 1 and 2 >> >> >> >> >> >> interface Loopback100 >> >> >> >> >> >> description SHAMLINK Interface >> >> >> >> >> >> ip vrf forwarding CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> ip address 11.11.11.11 255.255.255.255 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 3 >> >> >> >> >> >> router bgp 100 >> >> >> >> >> >> address-family ipv4 vrf CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> redistribute ospf 14 vrf CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> network 11.11.11.11 mask 255.255.255.255 >> >> >> >> >> >> exit-address-family >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 4 >> >> >> >> >> >> router ospf 14 vrf CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> area 0 sham-link 11.11.11.11 33.33.33.33 >> >> >> >> >> >> redistribute bgp 100 subnets route-map SHAM >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 5 >> >> >> >> >> >> access-list 10 permit 33.33.33.33 >> >> >> >> >> >> access-list 10 permit 11.11.11.11 >> >> >> >> >> >> ! >> >> >> >> >> >> route-map SHAM deny 10 >> >> >> >> >> >> match ip address 10 >> >> >> >> >> >> ! >> >> >> >> >> >> route-map SHAM permit 20 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> PE2 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 1 and 2 >> >> >> >> >> >> interface Loopback100 >> >> >> >> >> >> description SHAMLINK Interface >> >> >> >> >> >> ip vrf forwarding CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> ip address 33.33.33.33 255.255.255.255 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 3 >> >> >> >> >> >> router bgp 100 >> >> >> >> >> >> redistribute ospf 14 vrf CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> network 33.33.33.33 mask 255.255.255.255 >> >> >> >> >> >> exit-address-family >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 4 >> >> >> >> >> >> router ospf 14 vrf CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> area 0 sham-link 33.33.33.33 11.11.11.11 >> >> >> >> >> >> redistribute bgp 100 subnets route-map SHAM >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 5 >> >> >> >> >> >> access-list 10 permit 33.33.33.33 >> >> >> >> >> >> access-list 10 permit 11.11.11.11 >> >> >> >> >> >> ! >> >> >> >> >> >> route-map SHAM deny 10 >> >> >> >> >> >> match ip address 10 >> >> >> >> >> >> ! >> >> >> >> >> >> route-map SHAM permit 20 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: <http://packetsanalyzed.blogspot.com/> >> >> >> http://packetsanalyzed.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> please >> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> > please >> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > >> >> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> please >> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Message: 3 >> >> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 00:36:14 +0400 >> >> From: Vladimir Osipenko <[email protected]> >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] GNS3 Connection Lost >> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> >> >> You can set up maximum RAM per hypervisor in a such way, that there >> >> will be one router bgp process. >> >> >> >> On 23 May 2011 23:10, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I had the same problem and I couldn't figure out what the issue was. >> >> > I >> >> had >> >> > to create the topology from the scratch. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Regards, >> >> > Lukasz >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:04:47 -0700, Max Kamali wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> try putting the BB routers on a different hyporvisor. I notice the >> >> >> same error when trying to start more than 9 virtual routers. >> >> >> >> >> >> -masiko >> >> >> >> >> >> On May 23, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Jabran Javaid wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Hello friends, >> >> >>> >> >> >>> i am having an error on GNS3 "Connection Lost" while i execute one >> >> >>> of >> >> the >> >> >>> internet toplogies 5.00 version of gns3. >> >> >>> BB1 , BB2 and BB3 doesnot start and i receive error in GNS3 as >> >> connection >> >> >>> lost. >> >> >>> kindly assist >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Jabran Javaid >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> please >> >> >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> > please >> >> > visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > >> >> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Message: 4 >> >> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 00:38:03 +0400 >> >> From: Vladimir Osipenko <[email protected]> >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] GNS3 Connection Lost >> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> >> >> Ohhh God! I meant "one router per process" >> >> >> >> >> >> On 24 May 2011 00:36, Vladimir Osipenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > You can set up maximum RAM per hypervisor in a such way, that there >> >> > will be one router bgp process. >> >> > >> >> > On 23 May 2011 23:10, ?<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> I had the same problem and I couldn't figure out what the issue was. >> >> >> I >> >> had >> >> >> to create the topology from the scratch. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Lukasz >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:04:47 -0700, Max Kamali wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> try putting the BB routers on a different hyporvisor. I notice the >> >> >>> same error when trying to start more than 9 virtual routers. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> -masiko >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On May 23, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Jabran Javaid wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Hello friends, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> i am having an error on GNS3 "Connection Lost" while i execute one >> >> >>>> of >> >> the >> >> >>>> internet toplogies 5.00 version of gns3. >> >> >>>> BB1 , BB2 and BB3 doesnot start and i receive error in GNS3 as >> >> connection >> >> >>>> lost. >> >> >>>> kindly assist >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Jabran Javaid >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> please >> >> >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> please >> >> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Message: 5 >> >> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 17:54:35 -0400 >> >> From: "Jason Maynard" <[email protected]> >> >> To: "'Jason Maynard'" <[email protected]>, "'Combatant >> >> 101'" >> >> <[email protected]>, "'Nicolas Bellenbaum'" < >> >> [email protected]> >> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF SHAMLinks >> >> Message-ID: <018701cc1994$02024860$0606d920$@[email protected]> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> >> >> FYI - my config is bang on - Must have been an issue with GNS3 (I may >> >> try >> >> it >> >> again later....I will update the study group) >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: [email protected] >> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Maynard >> >> Sent: May-23-11 3:59 PM >> >> To: 'Combatant 101'; 'Nicolas Bellenbaum' >> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF SHAMLinks >> >> >> >> I cannot get it to work....Do you see any issue with the configuration >> >> - I >> >> am at the point to say it is a GNS3 issue but would like to confirm the >> >> configuration >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: [email protected] >> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Combatant 101 >> >> Sent: May-23-11 2:53 PM >> >> To: Nicolas Bellenbaum >> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF SHAMLinks >> >> >> >> Funnily enough when I block the loopbacks of Sham going into OSPF it >> >> kills >> >> my sham link altogether! >> >> >> >> The only way I seem to fix this is by doing a no area x sham-link etc >> >> etc >> >> and then putting the sham-link command back in and poof it all >> >> workings. >> >> >> >> This has been the case several times! >> >> >> >> Haven't really bothered to investigate why but this solution works for >> >> me >> >> on >> >> physical and GNS3 >> >> >> >> HTH >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone 4 >> >> >> >> On 23 May 2011, at 10:03, Nicolas Bellenbaum <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I've had issues when i block both loopbacks from being redistributed >> >> > into >> >> OSPF. When i only filtered the loopback local to the PE from being >> >> redistributed into OSPF the sham link came up with no issue. >> >> > >> >> > Nick >> >> > >> >> > On May 23, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Jason Maynard wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> I thought I would run this by the group as I am not getting the >> >> >> expected >> >> >> results in GNS3. Is there anything that I am missing when creating >> >> >> shamlinks? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 1. Create a loopback with a /32 address on PE Routers >> >> >> >> >> >> 2. Add these loopbacks to the VRF >> >> >> >> >> >> 3. Advertise these loopbacks into the vrf address-family in BGP (Do >> >> >> advertise these networks in OSPF) >> >> >> >> >> >> 4. Create a shamlink in the OSPF vrf process >> >> >> >> >> >> 5. Ensure /32 loopback addresses create above are not advertised in >> >> >> OSPF >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Complete Configuration (I only included the relevant information and >> >> >> it >> >> is >> >> >> assumed the you have an already functioning MPLS network) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> PE1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 1 and 2 >> >> >> >> >> >> interface Loopback100 >> >> >> >> >> >> description SHAMLINK Interface >> >> >> >> >> >> ip vrf forwarding CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> ip address 11.11.11.11 255.255.255.255 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 3 >> >> >> >> >> >> router bgp 100 >> >> >> >> >> >> address-family ipv4 vrf CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> redistribute ospf 14 vrf CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> network 11.11.11.11 mask 255.255.255.255 >> >> >> >> >> >> exit-address-family >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 4 >> >> >> >> >> >> router ospf 14 vrf CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> area 0 sham-link 11.11.11.11 33.33.33.33 >> >> >> >> >> >> redistribute bgp 100 subnets route-map SHAM >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 5 >> >> >> >> >> >> access-list 10 permit 33.33.33.33 >> >> >> >> >> >> access-list 10 permit 11.11.11.11 >> >> >> >> >> >> ! >> >> >> >> >> >> route-map SHAM deny 10 >> >> >> >> >> >> match ip address 10 >> >> >> >> >> >> ! >> >> >> >> >> >> route-map SHAM permit 20 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> PE2 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 1 and 2 >> >> >> >> >> >> interface Loopback100 >> >> >> >> >> >> description SHAMLINK Interface >> >> >> >> >> >> ip vrf forwarding CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> ip address 33.33.33.33 255.255.255.255 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 3 >> >> >> >> >> >> router bgp 100 >> >> >> >> >> >> redistribute ospf 14 vrf CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> network 33.33.33.33 mask 255.255.255.255 >> >> >> >> >> >> exit-address-family >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 4 >> >> >> >> >> >> router ospf 14 vrf CUSTA >> >> >> >> >> >> area 0 sham-link 33.33.33.33 11.11.11.11 >> >> >> >> >> >> redistribute bgp 100 subnets route-map SHAM >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Step 5 >> >> >> >> >> >> access-list 10 permit 33.33.33.33 >> >> >> >> >> >> access-list 10 permit 11.11.11.11 >> >> >> >> >> >> ! >> >> >> >> >> >> route-map SHAM deny 10 >> >> >> >> >> >> match ip address 10 >> >> >> >> >> >> ! >> >> >> >> >> >> route-map SHAM permit 20 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: <http://packetsanalyzed.blogspot.com/> >> >> >> http://packetsanalyzed.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> please >> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> > please >> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > >> >> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> please >> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> please >> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Message: 6 >> >> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:39:10 +0400 >> >> From: Vladimir Osipenko <[email protected]> >> >> To: Matt Hill <[email protected]> >> >> Cc: CC IE <[email protected]> >> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] BGP update source >> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> >> >> Well, I would check active/passive states (config one as active and >> >> the other as passive, then test. And then change roles and test >> >> again). Let us know, if that helps. >> >> >> >> On 19 May 2011 09:09, Matt Hill <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Pretty straightforward... In fact you will kick yourself... ?This >> >> > used >> >> > to get me too. >> >> > >> >> > The TCP session comes from the outgoing interface. >> >> > >> >> > Have you noticed that every destination ?port on the SAME ROUTER >> >> > EVERY >> >> > SINGLE TIME is 179? ?But when you have update-source lox it seems to >> >> > one time be on on router, and another time on the other? >> >> > >> >> > Have a look :) >> >> > >> >> > This would be one way of doing something like "ensure Rx is the TCP >> >> > source with a port >1024" or something like that if you are ever >> >> > asked. >> >> > >> >> > Cheers, >> >> > Matt >> >> > >> >> > CCIE #22386 >> >> > CCSI #31207 >> >> > >> >> > On 19 May 2011 14:19, Amit Jp <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Hi , >> >> >> I am trying to understand this but cant get proper answwer from >> >> >> anyone . >> >> >> Here is my diagram >> >> >> R1 ___R2 >> >> >> >> >> >> both are running BGP 1 . and i use serial interface to form neighbor >> >> >> relationship >> >> >> And i also use debug output i get source ip as outging interface and >> >> >> destination ip as the interface add of the remote end. >> >> >> . >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Now i use loop0 on both routers >> >> >> >> >> >> R1 >> >> >> >> >> >> Router bgp 1 >> >> >> neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 1 >> >> >> >> >> >> R2 >> >> >> router gp 1 >> >> >> neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> it doesnt form neighbor relationship . Ok as bgp uses outgoing >> >> >> interface >> >> by >> >> >> default to form neighbor relationship. >> >> >> >> >> >> So i use update lo0 on just one router >> >> >> Router 1 >> >> >> >> >> >> router bgp 1 >> >> >> neighbor 2.2.2.2 update source lo0 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Here's my question to all >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why only use update source on one end of the router and not the >> >> >> other >> >> end , >> >> >> neighbor still comes up as i use it on one end >> >> >> the outgoing interface of the remote router interface is still >> >> >> serial 0 >> >> so i >> >> >> need to change that remote end interfce from serial to loopback >> >> interface by >> >> >> using update source command ,,,ISNt't it??? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks and regards, >> >> >> >> >> >> Amit Jp >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> > please >> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > >> >> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 64, Issue 56 >> >> *************************************** >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Samir Idris >> > _______________________________________________ >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> > please visit www.ipexpert.com >> > >> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > > > > > -- > Samir Idris > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
