I understand your point and would welcome more instructor interaction. I would just point out that having seen first hand just how hard the instructors work (Marko is a machine), that I am inclined to cut them some slack.
What I mean by newer is regarding the workbooks, at the time of the announcement of the 4.0 blueprint IPE re-wrote a big part of volume 1 and I think pretty much all of volume 3. So that stuff is newer than the volume 2 material. I agree with you on the videos. On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Alef <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah yes, i get it now! > Thanks Marc. > The OSG thing, it's just that ipexpert seems to advertise it as part of > their study package. > "-24x7 peer group and Instructor support through our active email list > community" > It's not the first time i've seen it advertised as such, and so far i've > seen little instructor response. Not that i don't think it's a great idea, > but the bulk of the 'support' seems to lean on coming from the community, > not the instructors. > But i guess it's just a matter of interpretation. As for the DSG itself, i > find the quality pretty low. Lot's of tiny errors and lost in translation > errors (so it seems) or statements that dubious to understand. But i agree > there's a lot of good stuff if you are able to decipher what they mean :-) > What do you mean by the newer stuff? Personally i like the video's from Joe > Astorino a lot, they are very helpful and clear. > On Jul 15, 2011, at 7:47 PM, marc abel wrote: > > The distribute list is the part that actually does the filtering. The > summary address is there because you need to advertise 4.0.0.0/7 but > you don't actually have 4.0.0.0/7 as a route in your routing table. > > Just FYI, Vol 2 is largely composed of older (pre ver 4,0) labs. There > is a lot of good information in there but they don't seem quite as > polished as the newer stuff. > > As for the instructors, this is a group study list. Not ask the > instructors list. I believe the intention is that we are to help each > other. By doing so we all learn more. That the instructors participate > is a wonderful bonus. Keep in mind that this last week has been Cisco > live which I know Marko attended. Now I've never attended Cisco live, > but being that it is in Vegas I can imagine a few things I would > rather be doing than checking this mailing list :) > > -Marc > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Alef <[email protected]> wrote: > > It does not seem necessary? (i am referring to the distribute list) > > I.e. basically we want to only pass 4.0.0.0/7 and all of the 5.x.x.x. routes > from BB3 to R6. > > The config in the DSG is: > > ip prefix-list TEST permit 4.0.0.0/7 le 32 > > router eigrp 100 > > distribute-list prefix TEST in fa0/1 > > route-map 4and5 > > match ip address prefix 5only > > ip prefix-list 5only permit 5.0.0.0/8 le 32 > > int mu1 > > ip summary-address eigrp 100 4.0.0.0 254.0.0.0 leak-map 4and5only > > (ps i had to fix the dsg solution, it refers to the prefix-list directly for > the leak-map argument, but it expects a route-map there). > > Any help would be appreciated here. > > Are there still instructors on this list ? I barely see any response from > ipexpert people anymore? > > No offense but the most help i get is help from people who are also > studying, i understood the idea was that instructors are actually available > here. > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
