Agreed. Looking forward to Vol3 labs. On Jul 15, 2011, at 11:38 PM, marc abel wrote:
> I understand your point and would welcome more instructor > interaction. I would just point out that having seen first hand just > how hard the instructors work (Marko is a machine), that I am inclined > to cut them some slack. > > What I mean by newer is regarding the workbooks, at the time of the > announcement of the 4.0 blueprint IPE re-wrote a big part of volume 1 > and I think pretty much all of volume 3. So that stuff is newer than > the volume 2 material. I agree with you on the videos. > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Alef <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ah yes, i get it now! >> Thanks Marc. >> The OSG thing, it's just that ipexpert seems to advertise it as part of >> their study package. >> "-24x7 peer group and Instructor support through our active email list >> community" >> It's not the first time i've seen it advertised as such, and so far i've >> seen little instructor response. Not that i don't think it's a great idea, >> but the bulk of the 'support' seems to lean on coming from the community, >> not the instructors. >> But i guess it's just a matter of interpretation. As for the DSG itself, i >> find the quality pretty low. Lot's of tiny errors and lost in translation >> errors (so it seems) or statements that dubious to understand. But i agree >> there's a lot of good stuff if you are able to decipher what they mean :-) >> What do you mean by the newer stuff? Personally i like the video's from Joe >> Astorino a lot, they are very helpful and clear. >> On Jul 15, 2011, at 7:47 PM, marc abel wrote: >> >> The distribute list is the part that actually does the filtering. The >> summary address is there because you need to advertise 4.0.0.0/7 but >> you don't actually have 4.0.0.0/7 as a route in your routing table. >> >> Just FYI, Vol 2 is largely composed of older (pre ver 4,0) labs. There >> is a lot of good information in there but they don't seem quite as >> polished as the newer stuff. >> >> As for the instructors, this is a group study list. Not ask the >> instructors list. I believe the intention is that we are to help each >> other. By doing so we all learn more. That the instructors participate >> is a wonderful bonus. Keep in mind that this last week has been Cisco >> live which I know Marko attended. Now I've never attended Cisco live, >> but being that it is in Vegas I can imagine a few things I would >> rather be doing than checking this mailing list :) >> >> -Marc >> >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Alef <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It does not seem necessary? (i am referring to the distribute list) >> >> I.e. basically we want to only pass 4.0.0.0/7 and all of the 5.x.x.x. routes >> from BB3 to R6. >> >> The config in the DSG is: >> >> ip prefix-list TEST permit 4.0.0.0/7 le 32 >> >> router eigrp 100 >> >> distribute-list prefix TEST in fa0/1 >> >> route-map 4and5 >> >> match ip address prefix 5only >> >> ip prefix-list 5only permit 5.0.0.0/8 le 32 >> >> int mu1 >> >> ip summary-address eigrp 100 4.0.0.0 254.0.0.0 leak-map 4and5only >> >> (ps i had to fix the dsg solution, it refers to the prefix-list directly for >> the leak-map argument, but it expects a route-map there). >> >> Any help would be appreciated here. >> >> Are there still instructors on this list ? I barely see any response from >> ipexpert people anymore? >> >> No offense but the most help i get is help from people who are also >> studying, i understood the idea was that instructors are actually available >> here. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
