Hello to everybody,

I have a problem with procedure LAPB to multilink, secured by
eap.
In LAPB, since there is no master/slave relationship, the sender
uses the Poll bit to insist on an immediate response. In the
response frame this same bit becomes the receivers Final bit. The
receiver always turns on the Final bit in its response to a
command from the sender with the Poll bit set. The P/F bit is
generally used when either end becomes unsure about proper frame
sequencing because of a possible missing acknowledgement, and it
is necessary to re-establish a point of reference.
However eap does not work, just a little time
Belo the config

interface Multilink78
 ip address 193.44.78.8 255.255.255.128
 ppp reliable-link
 ppp ncp passive
 ppp multilink
 ppp multilink group 78
end
R8#sh runn int s0/0/0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 207 bytes
!
interface Serial0/0/0
 no ip address
 encapsulation ppp
 ppp reliable-link
 ppp authentication eap
 ppp eap identity R8
 ppp eap password 0 cisco
 ppp eap local
 ppp multilink
 ppp multilink group 78


 interface Serial0/0/0
 no ip address
 encapsulation ppp
 clock rate 2000000
 ppp reliable-link
 ppp authentication eap
 ppp eap identity R7
 ppp eap password 0 cisco
 ppp eap local
 ppp multilink
 ppp multilink group 78


Aug 17 05:39:31.787: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0/0/0,
changed state to up
Aug 17 05:39:31.787: Se0/0/0 PPP: Using default call direction
Aug 17 05:39:31.787: Se0/0/0 PPP: Treating connection as a
dedicated line
Aug 17 05:39:31.787: Se0/0/0 PPP: Session handle[F3000024]
Session id[28]
Aug 17 05:39:31.787: Se0/0/0 PPP: Authorization required
Aug 17 05:39:31.795: Se0/0/0 EAP: O REQUEST  IDENTITY id 19 len 5
Aug 17 05:39:31.795: Se0/0/0 EAP: I REQUEST  IDENTITY id 28 len 5
Aug 17 05:39:31.795: Se0/0/0 EAP: O RESPONSE IDENTITY id 28 len 7
from "R7"
Aug 17 05:39:31.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: I RESPONSE IDENTITY id 19 len 7
from "R8"
Aug 17 05:39:31.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: O REQUEST  MD5 id 20 len 24
from "R7"
Aug 17 05:39:31.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: I REQUEST  MD5 id 29 len 24
from "R8"
Aug 17 05:39:31.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: Using hostname from interface
EAP
Aug 17 05:39:31.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: Using password from interface
EAP
R7(config-if)#1.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: O RESPONSE MD5 id 29 len 24
from "R7"
Aug 17 05:39:31.803: Se0/0/0 EAP: I RESPONSE MD5 id 20 len 24
from "R8"
Aug 17 05:39:31.803: Se0/0/0 PPP: Sent CHAP LOGIN Request
Aug 17 05:39:31.803: Se0/0/0 PPP: Received LOGIN Response PASS
Aug 17 05:39:31.807: Se0/0/0 PPP: Sent LCP AUTHOR Request
Aug 17 05:39:31.807: Se0/0/0 PPP: Sent MLP AUTHOR Request
Aug 17 05:39:31.807: Se0/0/0 LCP: Received AAA AUTHOR Response
PASS
Aug 17 05:39:31.807: Se0/0/0 MLP: Received AAA AUTHOR Response
PASS
Aug 17 05:39:31.807: Se0/0/0 EAP: O SUCCESS id 20 len 4
Aug 17 05:39:31.811: Se0/0/0 EAP: I SUCCESS id 29 len 4
Aug 17 05:39:31.815: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Multilink78,
changed state to up
Aug 17 05:39:31.815: Mu78 PPP: Sent IPCP AUTHOR Request
Aug 17 05:39:31.815: Mu78 PPP: Sent CDPCP AUTHOR Request
Aug 17 05:39:31.819: Mu78 IPCP: Received AAA AUTHOR Response PASS
Aug 17 05:39:31.819: Mu78 CDPCP: Received AAA AUTHOR Response
PASS
Aug 17 05:39:32.811: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on
Interface Serial0/0/0, changed state to up
Aug 17 05:39:32.815: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on
Interface Multilink78, changed state to up

Thereafter is down. Am i missing something? Eap to multikink does
not work?Why?
Any idea ?
-- 
This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may 
contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the contents of 
this email.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses, 
the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
as they consider appropriate.
Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.


_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to