Have you added the local user accounts? R7(config)# username R8 password cisco R8(config)# username R7 password cisco
Atle Hardarson On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 7:26 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello to everybody, > > I have a problem with procedure LAPB to multilink, secured by > eap. > In LAPB, since there is no master/slave relationship, the sender > uses the Poll bit to insist on an immediate response. In the > response frame this same bit becomes the receivers Final bit. The > receiver always turns on the Final bit in its response to a > command from the sender with the Poll bit set. The P/F bit is > generally used when either end becomes unsure about proper frame > sequencing because of a possible missing acknowledgement, and it > is necessary to re-establish a point of reference. > However eap does not work, just a little time > Belo the config > > interface Multilink78 > ip address 193.44.78.8 255.255.255.128 > ppp reliable-link > ppp ncp passive > ppp multilink > ppp multilink group 78 > end > R8#sh runn int s0/0/0 > Building configuration... > Current configuration : 207 bytes > ! > interface Serial0/0/0 > no ip address > encapsulation ppp > ppp reliable-link > ppp authentication eap > ppp eap identity R8 > ppp eap password 0 cisco > ppp eap local > ppp multilink > ppp multilink group 78 > > > interface Serial0/0/0 > no ip address > encapsulation ppp > clock rate 2000000 > ppp reliable-link > ppp authentication eap > ppp eap identity R7 > ppp eap password 0 cisco > ppp eap local > ppp multilink > ppp multilink group 78 > > > Aug 17 05:39:31.787: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0/0/0, > changed state to up > Aug 17 05:39:31.787: Se0/0/0 PPP: Using default call direction > Aug 17 05:39:31.787: Se0/0/0 PPP: Treating connection as a > dedicated line > Aug 17 05:39:31.787: Se0/0/0 PPP: Session handle[F3000024] > Session id[28] > Aug 17 05:39:31.787: Se0/0/0 PPP: Authorization required > Aug 17 05:39:31.795: Se0/0/0 EAP: O REQUEST IDENTITY id 19 len 5 > Aug 17 05:39:31.795: Se0/0/0 EAP: I REQUEST IDENTITY id 28 len 5 > Aug 17 05:39:31.795: Se0/0/0 EAP: O RESPONSE IDENTITY id 28 len 7 > from "R7" > Aug 17 05:39:31.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: I RESPONSE IDENTITY id 19 len 7 > from "R8" > Aug 17 05:39:31.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: O REQUEST MD5 id 20 len 24 > from "R7" > Aug 17 05:39:31.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: I REQUEST MD5 id 29 len 24 > from "R8" > Aug 17 05:39:31.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: Using hostname from interface > EAP > Aug 17 05:39:31.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: Using password from interface > EAP > R7(config-if)#1.799: Se0/0/0 EAP: O RESPONSE MD5 id 29 len 24 > from "R7" > Aug 17 05:39:31.803: Se0/0/0 EAP: I RESPONSE MD5 id 20 len 24 > from "R8" > Aug 17 05:39:31.803: Se0/0/0 PPP: Sent CHAP LOGIN Request > Aug 17 05:39:31.803: Se0/0/0 PPP: Received LOGIN Response PASS > Aug 17 05:39:31.807: Se0/0/0 PPP: Sent LCP AUTHOR Request > Aug 17 05:39:31.807: Se0/0/0 PPP: Sent MLP AUTHOR Request > Aug 17 05:39:31.807: Se0/0/0 LCP: Received AAA AUTHOR Response > PASS > Aug 17 05:39:31.807: Se0/0/0 MLP: Received AAA AUTHOR Response > PASS > Aug 17 05:39:31.807: Se0/0/0 EAP: O SUCCESS id 20 len 4 > Aug 17 05:39:31.811: Se0/0/0 EAP: I SUCCESS id 29 len 4 > Aug 17 05:39:31.815: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Multilink78, > changed state to up > Aug 17 05:39:31.815: Mu78 PPP: Sent IPCP AUTHOR Request > Aug 17 05:39:31.815: Mu78 PPP: Sent CDPCP AUTHOR Request > Aug 17 05:39:31.819: Mu78 IPCP: Received AAA AUTHOR Response PASS > Aug 17 05:39:31.819: Mu78 CDPCP: Received AAA AUTHOR Response > PASS > Aug 17 05:39:32.811: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on > Interface Serial0/0/0, changed state to up > Aug 17 05:39:32.815: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on > Interface Multilink78, changed state to up > > Thereafter is down. Am i missing something? Eap to multikink does > not work?Why? > Any idea ? > -- > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and > may contain information that is privileged or confidential. > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the contents > of this email. > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks, > as they consider appropriate. > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard. > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
