I'm not sure. I am not aware of any BGP features that could monitor the number of links of an etherchannel and disable the link if the etherchannel loses a link.
Does the etherchannel go down if one of the links fails? That should force the traffic to go out the other path. On Aug 19, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Ghaleb Salah wrote: > Yes I do have on one side and I think is enough, I have heard about something > called traps with BGP, like a listener or state condition, I don't know if > I'm correct. > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Rogelio Gamino <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you have the "minimum-links" feature available? > > > On Aug 19, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Ghaleb Salah wrote: > > > Hello all, > > I have two routers form eBGP with and ISP, the internet traffic on each of > > them exceeds 1GB so we added two interfaces and formed a port-channel and > > eBGP neighbor-ship is now over that port-channel and everything is fine, the > > problem comes when one of the port-channel interfaces fail, the BGP won't > > notice the failure and the ISP won't use the backup route, any suggestion? > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > GS > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > > -- > Ghaleb Salah > Jerusalem, Mount of Olives. > +972 547 327 377 > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
