Cat1-MST#sh int fa0/21 FastEthernet0/21 is up, line protocol is up (connected) Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 000b.bee3.6c15 (bia 000b.bee3.6c15) MTU 1508 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, media type is 10/100BaseTX input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:01, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters never Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue: 0/40 (size/max) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 83900 packets input, 9402901 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 70279 broadcasts (0 multicasts) 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored 0 watchdog, 69389 multicast, 0 pause input 0 input packets with dribble condition detected 190768 packets output, 15567811 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 3 interface resets 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 PAUSE output 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
Cat3-MST(config-if)#do sh int fa0/21 FastEthernet0/21 is up, line protocol is up (connected) Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0019.2f02.5c17 (bia 0019.2f02.5c17) MTU 1508 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, media type is 10/100BaseTX input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input 00:00:01, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters never Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue: 0/40 (size/max) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 190794 packets input, 15570416 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 178207 broadcasts (178150 multicasts) 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored 0 watchdog, 178150 multicast, 0 pause input 0 input packets with dribble condition detected 83950 packets output, 9409256 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 5 interface resets 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 PAUSE output 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out Cat3-MST(config-if)#do sh span MST0 Spanning tree enabled protocol mstp Root ID Priority 24576 Address 0019.2f02.6580 Cost 0 Port 320 (Port-channel34) Hello Time 3 sec Max Age 15 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Bridge ID Priority 32768 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 0) Address 0019.2f02.5c00 Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type ------------------- ---- --- --------- -------- -------------------------------- Fa0/4 Desg FWD 200000 128.6 P2p Fa0/5 Desg FWD 200000 128.7 P2p Fa0/19 Desg FWD 20000 128.21 P2p Fa0/20 Desg FWD 20000 128.22 P2p Fa0/21 Desg FWD 200000 128.23 P2p Po34 Root FWD 100000 128.320 P2p >________________________________ >From: Oluwagbenga Oyebande <[email protected]> >To: John Puder <[email protected]>; CCIE OSL <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 8:04 PM >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Average age for CCIE Candidates > > >that's right. > > >do a "show int fas0/21" on Cat 1 >do a "show int fas0/21" on Cat 3 >do a "show span" on Cat 3 > > >and let's see the output > > > > > > >from task 3.7 > > >On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:33 AM, John Puder <[email protected]> wrote: > >I am pretty sure that I shut it down, if not, the gig link would have come up >as the root, since it would have the lowest cost. >> >>Thanks, >> >> >>John >> >> >> >>On Nov 15, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Oluwagbenga Oyebande <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >> >>confirm that the Gigabit link btw Cat1 and Cat2 is shut down. If that link is >>up the path cost factor would come in. It should be shut down >>> >>> >>>On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:58 PM, John Puder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>All, >>>> >>>> >>>>I am working on Volume 1 - Lab 3 and have run in to an issue on 3.8. I am >>>>using the Proctor Labs vRacks. I believe that I have set the labs up >>>>correctly, but am not coming up with the expected results. The lab states: >>>> >>>>If the links between Cat1 and Cat4 fail, the backup path should be the >>>>highest port number to Cat3. If this link fails, the highest port number to >>>>Cat2 should come next in line. If changes are made on Cat1, Cat1 is only >>>>allowed one interface command. Manual methods of backup are not allowed. >>>> >>>>I have configured MST to run on Cat1, Cat2, Cat3, and Cat4 on previous labs. >>>> >>>> >>>>On Cat1, I configured the following commands: >>>> >>>>conf t >>>>int fa0/22 >>>>spanning-tree mst 0 cost 40000 >>>> >>>>On Cat2, I configured the following commands: >>>>int fa0/24 >>>>spanning-tree mst 0 port-priority 64 >>>> >>>>When I checked the solution guide this was the correct configuration, It >>>>did not work. When I shut down fa0/19 and fa0/20 on Cat4, the spanning-tree >>>>reconverged and fa0/22 was chosen as the new root. When I shut down fa0/22 >>>>on Cat3, fa0/21 became the next root, instead of fa0/24. I checked >>>>everything and found that the bridge id on Cat3 for MST0 was: >>>>8000.0019.2f02.5c00 and the bridge id on Cat2 for MST0 was: >>>>8000.001b.d4c7.e700. The Cat2 bridge id was higher still, so I changed the >>>>bridge priority to 28672 and my new bridge id on Cat2 was: >>>>7000.001b.d4c7.e700. When I tried the test again, it still made no >>>>difference. fa0/21 to Cat3 was still the root over fa0/24 to Cat2. >>>> >>>>When I run the sh spanning-tree int fa0/21 det & sh spanning-tree int >>>>fa0/24 det this is my output: >>>> >>>>Cat1-MST#sh spanning-tree int fa0/21 det >>>> Port 21 (FastEthernet0/21) of MST0 is root forwarding >>>> Port path cost 200000, Port priority 128, Port Identifier 128.21. >>>> Designated root has priority 24576, address 0019.2f02.6580 >>>> Designated bridge has priority 32768, address 0019.2f02.5c00 >>>> Designated port id is 128.23, designated path cost 0 >>>> Timers: message age 7, forward delay 0, hold 0 >>>> Number of transitions to forwarding state: 1 >>>> Link type is point-to-point by default, Internal >>>> BPDU: sent 4, received 16 >>>>Cat1-MST#sh spanning-tree int fa0/24 det >>>> Port 24 (FastEthernet0/24) of MST0 is alternate blocking >>>> Port path cost 200000, Port priority 128, Port Identifier 128.24. >>>> Designated root has priority 24576, address 0019.2f02.6580 >>>> Designated bridge has priority 28672, address 001b.d4c7.e700 >>>> Designated port id is 64.26, designated path cost 0 >>>> Timers: message age 7, forward delay 0, hold 0 >>>> Number of transitions to forwarding state: 4 >>>> Link type is point-to-point by default, Internal >>>> BPDU: sent 647, received 310 >>>> >>>>Can someone help me figure out why this lab is not working like it should? >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>> >>>>John >>>> >>>> >>>>>________________________________ >>>>>From: Rob Pool <[email protected]> >>>>>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Oluwagbenga Oyebande >>>>><[email protected]>; CCIE OSL <[email protected]> >>>>>Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 2:03 PM >>>> >>>>>Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Average age for CCIE Candidates >>>>> >>>> >>>>>Alex, >>>>> >>>>>Your inference that those participating in this email thread are inferior >>>>>to you and aren’t skilled network professionals is without basis. Frankly >>>>>your poor English and your inability to form a complete thought or >>>>>sentence makes your insult rather laughable. You’ve done nothing more with >>>>>your email than to further litter peoples inboxes with useless email. >>>>>You’re not the moderator on this mailing list and it’s not your position >>>>>to police what’s informative to the group and what isn’t. With regard to >>>>>emailing Marko, really? How old are you that you feel the need to go >>>>>tell... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>________________________________ >>>> >>>>>From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>>To: Oluwagbenga Oyebande <[email protected]>; CCIE OSL >>>>><[email protected]> >>>>>Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:36 PM >>>>>Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Average age for CCIE Candidates >>>>> >>>>>Guys >>>>> >>>>>Please stop these mails please >>>>>we are not here to discuss our ages rather techinican topic >>>>>Do not waste time for to read post totally useless. >>>>>those who promoted this topic can not be certainly to have a >>>>>degree in Networking or engineering. >>>>>focus energies on technical issues >>>>>I do not want to see more on this subject run mailing list >>>>>Furthemore i ask to Marko M. if he is agree. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 11:38 AM, "Oluwagbenga Oyebande" >>>>><[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> 1. I think the info on age is useful to some people as that may >>>>>have been >>>>>> a >>>>>> question on their minds for some time. >>>>>> 2. This list is for tech discussion, but it is also an avenue >>>>>to get >>>>>> answers to questions on issues that may be important to some. >>>>>> 3. The age issue may offend some. It doesn't offend me, but I >>>>>believe no >>>>>> matter the age, a CCIE (or prospective CCIE) should be a mature >>>>>& >>>>>> responsible person that cares about the feelings of others, >>>>>especially on >>>>>> issues like this. >>>>>> 4. I therefore suggest that the info gathered is sufficient and >>>>>this >>>>>> issue >>>>>> be put to rest for now. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:25 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > Hello >>>>>> > First, I think this mailing list was introduced to discuss >>>>>and share CCIE >>>>>> > technical knowledge . >>>>>> > The subject is really very trivial and I think a lot of PPI >>>>>agree with me >>>>>> > on this point >>>>>> > >>>>>> > What does it mean when you ask about the age of a CCIE >>>>>candidate !!!! ??? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Learning and studying are not depending on your age whether >>>>>you are young >>>>>> > or old. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Sent using BlackBerry® from mobinil >>>>>> > >>>>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>>>> > From: Arnold Batista <[email protected]> >>>>>> > Sender: [email protected] >>>>>> > Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:06:07 >>>>>> > Cc: <[email protected]>; >>>>><[email protected]> >>>>>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Average age for CCIE Candidates >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > unsubcribe please >>>>>> > Thanks >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 04:21:04 +0530 >>>>>> > > From: [email protected] >>>>>> > > To: [email protected] >>>>>> > > CC: [email protected]; >>>>>[email protected] >>>>>> > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Average age for CCIE >>>>>Candidates >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Ben u r absolutely right.... >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Ben Hughes >>>>><[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > > Lol, thanks Matt. You gave me my morning laugh! >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > From: Matt Hill >>>>><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>> > > > Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 06:57:17 +1100 >>>>>> > > > To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >>>>>< >>>>>> > > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>> > > > Cc: "[email protected]<mailto: >>>>>> > > > [email protected]>" < >>>>>> > [email protected] >>>>>> > > > <mailto:[email protected]>>, " >>>>>> > > > >>>>>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >>>>>< >>>>>> > > > >>>>>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>> > > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Average age for CCIE >>>>>Candidates >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > Don't read the email then. You know what the content is >>>>>when you see >>>>>> > the >>>>>> > > > subject in the email. >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > I'd rather read this than the 496th email about someone >>>>>who can't RTFM >>>>>> > and >>>>>> > > > get his GNS3 to run on his 386SX-25 with 2MB RAM with >>>>>Windows 3.1. >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > Sent from my iPad >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > On 15/11/2011, at 4:09, [email protected]<mailto: >>>>>> > [email protected]> >>>>>> > > > wrote: >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > Guys >>>>>> > > > Please stop these mails please >>>>>> > > > we are not here to discuss our ages >>>>>> > > > Do not waste our times in reading these trivial posts >>>>>> > > > Sent using BlackBerry® from mobinil >>>>>> > > > -----Original Message----- >>>>>> > > > From: "JIM S. MCCANN" >>>>><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>> > > > Sender: [email protected]<mailto: >>>>>> > > > [email protected]> >>>>>> > > > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:45:59 >>>>>> > > > To: Jawed >>>>>Lashari<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; < >>>>>> > > > >>>>>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>> > > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Average age for CCIE >>>>>Candidates >>>>>> > > > 59 here this past Oct... >>>>>> > > > Jim >>>>>> > > > -----Original Message----- >>>>>> > > > From: [email protected]<mailto: >>>>>> > > > [email protected]> >>>>>> > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >>>>>Jawed >>>>>> > Lashari >>>>>> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 1:09 PM >>>>>> > > > To: >>>>>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>> > > > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Average age for CCIE Candidates >>>>>> > > > My age is 35 and sometimes I think that I am too old to >>>>>remember all >>>>>> > > > CCIE material. So just curious, what is average age of >>>>>candidates >>>>>> > who >>>>>> > > > are studying for CCIE Lab J >>>>>> > > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>>>>training, >>>>>> > > > please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> > > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted >>>>>with it are >>>>>> > > > confidential and intended solely for use of the >>>>>recipient(s). Any >>>>>> > review, >>>>>> > > > retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking >>>>>any action in >>>>>> > > > reliance upon this information by person or entities >>>>>other than >>>>>> > intended >>>>>> > > > recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this >>>>>e-mail in error, >>>>>> > > > please notify the sender immediately, and destroy the >>>>>material, whether >>>>>> > > > stored on a computer or otherwise. >>>>>> > > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>>>>training, >>>>>> > please >>>>>> > > > visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> > > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> > > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>>>>training, >>>>>> > please >>>>>> > > > visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> > > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> > > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>>>>training, >>>>>> > please >>>>>> > > > visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> > > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>>>>training, >>>>>> > please >>>>>> > > > visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> > > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>>>>training, >>>>>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>>>>training, please >>>>>> > visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>>>>training, please >>>>>> > visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Olugbenga Oyebande >>>>>> MD, DAIT >>>>>> 234-803-302-5287 >>>>>> http://www.dait-ng.com >>>>>> Cisco Unified Network, VPN >>>>>> DAIT Enterprise Network Servers >>>>>> Broadband Internet Deployment & ISP Consultancy >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>>>>training, please >>>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and >>>>>may contain information that is privileged or confidential. >>>>>If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the >>>>>contents of this email. >>>>>Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of >>>>>viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks, >>>>>as they consider appropriate. >>>>>Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>>visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>>Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>>visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>>Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>>Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>-- >>>Olugbenga Oyebande >>>MD, DAIT >>>234-803-302-5287 >>>http://www.dait-ng.com >>>Cisco Unified Network, VPN >>>DAIT Enterprise Network Servers >>>Broadband Internet Deployment & ISP Consultancy >>> > > > >-- >-- >Olugbenga Oyebande >MD, DAIT >234-803-302-5287 >http://www.dait-ng.com >Cisco Unified Network, VPN >DAIT Enterprise Network Servers >Broadband Internet Deployment & ISP Consultancy > > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
