I agree, defaulting both physical ports (also deleting the port channel) 
then re configuring both using the range command. It appears one of the 
physical ports is set for dynamic desirable and the other is hard coded to 
trunk unconditionally.
 
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, 
he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." 
Thomas Jefferson
" Where ignorance is bliss 'tis folly to be wise"


________________________________
 From: JM NGOK <[email protected]>
To: Adam Booth <[email protected]>; marc abel <[email protected]> 
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Ether-channel error
 
Shutdown these ports and delete the port-channel interface. Paste Adam's 
configuration ,reconfigure the port-channel and bring these interfaces up.

Am I wrong?
 
     Jean-Marie NGOK 
 Senior Network Engineer



________________________________
From: Adam Booth <[email protected]>
To: marc abel <[email protected]> 
Cc: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Ether-channel error

Hi Marc,

Do Fa0/23 and Fa0/24 have the same configurations?  For example is one port
switch access for instance, with the other able to negotiate a trunk using
DTP?

Perhaps look at hard setting the interfaces to what you want

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate

Cheers,
Adam

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:54 AM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have two dynamic desirable trunks configured as an ether-channel and
> one keeps un-bundling
>
> Nov 20 19:49:06.347: %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Fa0/23 is not compatible
> with Fa0/24 and will be suspended (trunk mode of Fa0/23 is access,
> Fa0/24 is trunk)
> Nov 20 19:49:07.335: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> FastEthernet0/23, changed state to down
>
>
> It then comes back up and everything seems fine for a bit and then it
> happens again. Any idea what the issue could be or how to
> troubleshoot? Obviously I could configure them as statically trunking
> but a lab requirement prevents this.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Marc
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> To Unsubscribe from this list please visit the following link and follow
> the directions to unsubscribe.
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

To Unsubscribe from this list please visit the following link and follow the 
directions to unsubscribe. http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

To Unsubscribe from this list please visit the following link and follow the 
directions to unsubscribe. http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

To Unsubscribe from this list please visit the following link and follow the 
directions to unsubscribe. http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to