+1 to the paranoid group (voices in my head told me to say it) -Randy
On Dec 5, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Michael Davis - Webquor <[email protected]> wrote: > My way of thinking on this is that we don't really know the impact that > aliases and tcl scripts etc have on the grading script so it may be better > to be safe than sorry and remove them. > I might be too paranoid.... > Sent from my iPhone > > On 06/12/2011, at 10:54 AM, "Zsigmond P.Toth" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Well, aliases are quiet type of dudes compared to a left on debug but you > might be right. > > Br, > Zsigmond P.Toth - HP > AIS<https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/people/zsigmond.p.toth> > > > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Michael Davis - Webquor > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Good point! I have also been advised in the past to remove any aliases also, > don’t know if this is still necessary. > > > > [cid:] > Michael Davis > CCIE #26050, CISSP #376023 , ECC C|EH > MCSE > Webquor Services Pty Limited > Suite 504, Level 5 > 105 Pitt Street > Sydney NSW 2000 > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Tel: 1300 653 115 > Fax: +61 (2) 8905 9224<tel:%2B61%20%282%29%208905%209224> > ITIL® Accredited<http://www.itil-officialsite.com/> > ITIL®<http://www.itil-officialsite.com/> is a Registered Trade Mark of the > Office of Government Commerce, in the United Kingdom and other countries. > P Please consider the environment before printing this email > "This communication is intended for the addressed recipient only. It may > contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from > disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any > use, disclosure, dissemination or any action taken or admitted to be taken or > reliance on it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in > error, please reply to the sender immediately and delete the document. Except > as required by law, Webquor Services Pty. Limited does not represent, warrant > and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been > maintained. We also do not guarantee that the communication is free of > errors, virus, interception or interference, but do assume that the utmost > effort and technology has been utilised to ensure that the information is > free from such effects”. > > > From: Zsigmond P.Toth > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 10:48 AM > To: Michael Davis - Webquor > Cc: Matt Hill; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] grading > > Except for leaving debugging on... > That could interfere with automatic grading. > > Br, > Zsigmond P.Toth - HP > AIS<https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/people/zsigmond.p.toth> > > > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Michael Davis - Webquor > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Additional configurations are usually fine also as long as they don't break > the rules. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 06/12/2011, at 9:34 AM, "Matt Hill" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Short version: >> >> If it works, hasnt broken something else and is not anything that you >> have been specifically told not to do then you score. >> >> Cheers, >> Matt >> >> CCIE #22386 >> CCSI #31207 >> >> On 6 December 2011 07:56, Josh Chamberlain >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> Hi, I have a question about how the grading is performed. Is it fair to say >>> that if you meet the objectives without violating any rules or limitations >>> than you are OK? What if you think of a way to solve a problem that Cisco >>> had not considered? Will they catch that in the grading script? As we all >>> know, there are often several ways to skin a cat and I wonder whether we >>> can be confident that they thought of all the possibilities or should we be >>> trying to deduce the manor in which they expect us to solve a problem? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com> >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com> >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com> >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com> > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com> > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
