No takers? Any feedback would be much appreciated. On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Blake Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> If someone could help me understand this, I would be grateful. > > Cat1 Lo1 has address 150.10.101.101. R1 is configured to auto-summarize > in RIP. It's advertising 150.10.0.0/16 to R2. Cat 3 and 4 are > configured with 150.10.103.103 and 150.10.104.104 respectively. They are > configured to summarize, per task 3.6, to 150.10.96.0/20 to R6 and R9. > That being said, after redistribution, R8 has a route for 150.10.0.0/16and > 150.10.96.0/20 but nothing for 150.10.101.101. > > Naturally, traffic for Cat1's Lo interface will be routed to Cat3 and Cat4 > per longest match. The DSG shows successful pings to 150.10.101.101 from > R8. How is this possible? > > Appreciate the feedback. > > -Blake > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
