Thanks Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device available from BTC. -----Original Message----- From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:10:55 To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>; Bob McCouch<[email protected]>; CCIE ONLINE STUDY LIST<[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Just a quick questions
If you don't want the debug output shown on console: logging console informational logging buffered debug View the log buffer with "show logging". -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 13:07, <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the command to send debug out put to the buffer and display it > afterward? > > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device available from BTC. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:57:00 > To: Bob McCouch<[email protected]> > Cc: CCIE ONLINE STUDY LIST<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Just a quick questions > > Well, my guess is that the minuscule additional load I indicated has > something to do with the fact that router would have to change the context > of the execution for the instruction that follows. I.e. internally, a > different parser may need to be involved. I don't believe additional copy > of exec is involved though, but it's Cisco™. Anything's possible ;-) > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) > Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:33, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I guess that leads me to ask why the "do" command results in any > > additional load versus doing the same command from exec mode. I always > > assumed "do" just signaled the CLI parser to run the command as if it was > > in exec-mode, but the suggestion that it might generate any extra load at > > all is making me wonder if it doesn't do something silly like spawn > another > > exec session, run the command and pipe the results back to the config > mode > > session that "do" was run from. > > > > Marko, do you know how the command actually works? Irrelevant to the lab > > exam, I'm sure, but you've piqued my interest. > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On Apr 14, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 09:09, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I'd like to know if anyone can confirm that impact. Does a "do show" > >> command actually result in different CPU impact than an exec-mode > >> 'show' command?? > > > > > > It is entirely possible, but perhaps 0.005% of the total load. > > Virtual-exec has almost the lowest priority on the router anyway, so the > > impact should be effectively none. > > > > -- > > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) > > Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert > > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
