Hi guys A speculative question but I need to know if v4 will become v5 anytime soon, reason for asking is I'm planning on buying equipment and training materials and do not want to buy old gear.
BR Tony CCNP CCNA R&S Sent from my iPhone on 3 On 22 Apr 2012, at 08:20, [email protected] wrote: > Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: CCIElab lab 5 (Marko Milivojevic) > 2. Vol 1 - 29.6 (Joe Danrich) > 3. CCIE level Labs (Breland Rogers) > 4. VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (khaled al-ajeman) > 5. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a ([email protected]) > 6. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (Joe Danrich) > 7. Re: Vol 1 - 29.6 (Elie Raad) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:16:00 -0700 > From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, ccie > onlyone <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIElab lab 5 > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Bloody bastard keeps changing email address. We've banned 7 last week. > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > > :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and > brevity. :: > > On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:53, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How is it that if I post something even with the slightest opinion, Marko >> shuts it down, and offline emails me. >> >> BUT >> >> This guy stays on the distro. I think Marko needs to pay closer watch an >> help us filter these guys out. ;) >> >> Oh, and I expect this continue, even after Marko emails me a nasty note from >> IPX. >> >> Happy labbing weekend, gents! >> >> Regards, >> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP >> Sent from iJay >> >> On Apr 21, 2012, at 7:22 AM, ccie onlyone <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> My friend got the new lab, just to get update, add me >>> >>> regards, >>> ccietocome >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:52:47 -0700 > From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one > per a specific router.. > > It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each > respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. > > However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state > that each router should import the others route-target? > > It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do > something, you shouldn't do it.. > > Am I missing something here? > > V/R > > Joe > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:16:53 -0700 (PDT) > From: Breland Rogers <[email protected]> > To: IPEXPERT <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE level Labs > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Hello,? > > Could anyone please share any free GNS3 CCIE level labs that are free. ?Im 21 > and on a budget. > > Thanks.? > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 +0300 > From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a > Message-ID: > <CACv-o9uinWBPs9=s-kyf1qm5e2ekwrnhu6r7s8kq5+_zcgy...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi fellas, > > I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up > as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration > > R2 ------ > hub > > > R2#sr | s bgp > router bgp 1 > no bgp default ipv4-unicast > bgp log-neighbor-changes > neighbor peergroup peer-group > neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 > neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 > neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup > neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup > ! > address-family ipv4 > neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client > neighbor peergroup next-hop-self > neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate > neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > ! > address-family ipv4 multicast > neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client > neighbor peergroup next-hop-self > neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate > neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > R2# > > > > R1 ----------> spoke > > R1#sr | s bg > router bgp 1 > no bgp default ipv4-unicast > bgp log-neighbor-changes > neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 > neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 > ! > address-family ipv4 > neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > ! > address-family ipv4 multicast > neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > R1# > > > > > > R5 --------> Spoke > > > R5#sr | s bg > router bgp 1 > no bgp default ipv4-unicast > bgp log-neighbor-changes > neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 > neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 > ! > address-family ipv4 > neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > ! > address-family ipv4 multicast > neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > R5# > > here is my output from R2: > > > > R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum > BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 > BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 > Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > State/PfxRcd > 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never > Active ---------------> it is > suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 > 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum > BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 > BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 > Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > State/PfxRcd > 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > R2# > > > > Thanks, > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:42:52 +0000 > From: [email protected] > To: "khaled al-ajeman" <[email protected]>, > [email protected], [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a > Message-ID: > > <1993407919-1335076970-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-892677182-@b28.c9.bise7.blackberry> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" > > Hi Khaled, > I am not familar with the topology but have u confirmed layer 3 reachability > between ur spoke and hub? Sourcing ur icmp pings from your respective > loopbacks? > Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria. > > -----Original Message----- > From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a > > Hi fellas, > > I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up > as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration > > R2 ------ > hub > > > R2#sr | s bgp > router bgp 1 > no bgp default ipv4-unicast > bgp log-neighbor-changes > neighbor peergroup peer-group > neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 > neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 > neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup > neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup > ! > address-family ipv4 > neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client > neighbor peergroup next-hop-self > neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate > neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > ! > address-family ipv4 multicast > neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client > neighbor peergroup next-hop-self > neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate > neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > R2# > > > > R1 ----------> spoke > > R1#sr | s bg > router bgp 1 > no bgp default ipv4-unicast > bgp log-neighbor-changes > neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 > neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 > ! > address-family ipv4 > neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > ! > address-family ipv4 multicast > neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > R1# > > > > > > R5 --------> Spoke > > > R5#sr | s bg > router bgp 1 > no bgp default ipv4-unicast > bgp log-neighbor-changes > neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 > neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 > ! > address-family ipv4 > neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > ! > address-family ipv4 multicast > neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate > no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-family > R5# > > here is my output from R2: > > > > R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum > BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 > BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 > Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > State/PfxRcd > 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never > Active ---------------> it is > suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 > 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum > BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 > BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 > Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > State/PfxRcd > 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active > R2# > > > > Thanks, > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:55:30 -0700 > From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> > To: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Can you ping from each source BGP Speaker interface to the relevant peer? > > V/R > > Joe > > On 04/21/2012 10:57 PM, khaled al-ajeman wrote: >> Hi fellas, >> >> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >> >> R2 ------> hub >> >> >> R2#sr | s bgp >> router bgp 1 >> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >> bgp log-neighbor-changes >> neighbor peergroup peer-group >> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >> ! >> address-family ipv4 >> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >> no auto-summary >> no synchronization >> exit-address-family >> ! >> address-family ipv4 multicast >> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >> no auto-summary >> no synchronization >> exit-address-family >> R2# >> >> >> >> R1 ----------> spoke >> >> R1#sr | s bg >> router bgp 1 >> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >> bgp log-neighbor-changes >> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >> ! >> address-family ipv4 >> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >> no auto-summary >> no synchronization >> exit-address-family >> ! >> address-family ipv4 multicast >> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >> no auto-summary >> no synchronization >> exit-address-family >> R1# >> >> >> >> >> >> R5 --------> Spoke >> >> >> R5#sr | s bg >> router bgp 1 >> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >> bgp log-neighbor-changes >> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >> ! >> address-family ipv4 >> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >> no auto-summary >> no synchronization >> exit-address-family >> ! >> address-family ipv4 multicast >> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >> no auto-summary >> no synchronization >> exit-address-family >> R5# >> >> here is my output from R2: >> >> >> >> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >> State/PfxRcd >> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >> Active ---------------> it is >> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >> State/PfxRcd >> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >> R2# >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:20:08 +0000 > From: Elie Raad <[email protected]> > To: Joe Danrich <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 > Message-ID: > > <3840b1aaec7edd4caff9def3ad0131b81b8d7...@amsprd0104mb146.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hello Joe, > > I did the same as you did , but when i read in 29.9 he said that do not > change next-hop addresses of receiving routes from R2 and R8. which mean that > he want us to exchange routes coming from R2 and R8 . > > > Best Regards, > > Elie Raad > > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] > [[email protected]] on behalf of Joe Danrich > [[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 11:52 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 > > Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one > per a specific router.. > > It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each > respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. > > However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state > that each router should import the others route-target? > > It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do > something, you shouldn't do it.. > > Am I missing something here? > > V/R > > Joe > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > > > End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 > *************************************** _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
