I believe Marko blogged about it in Feb. have you searched the archives? Regards, Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP Sent from iJay
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm unaware of any announced changes to the exam, and Cisco's policy > is that before a major change (like 4.0 to 5.0) they will give > "plenty" of warning which is at least 6 months as far as I know. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi guys >> >> A speculative question but I need to know if v4 will become v5 anytime soon, >> reason for asking is I'm planning on buying equipment and training materials >> and do not want to buy old gear. >> >> BR >> >> Tony >> CCNP CCNA R&S >> >> Sent from my iPhone on 3 >> >> On 22 Apr 2012, at 08:20, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >>> [email protected] >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> [email protected] >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> [email protected] >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. Re: CCIElab lab 5 (Marko Milivojevic) >>> 2. Vol 1 - 29.6 (Joe Danrich) >>> 3. CCIE level Labs (Breland Rogers) >>> 4. VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (khaled al-ajeman) >>> 5. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a ([email protected]) >>> 6. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (Joe Danrich) >>> 7. Re: Vol 1 - 29.6 (Elie Raad) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:16:00 -0700 >>> From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >>> To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> >>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, ccie >>> onlyone <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIElab lab 5 >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >>> >>> Bloody bastard keeps changing email address. We've banned 7 last week. >>> >>> -- >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >>> >>> :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and >>> brevity. :: >>> >>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:53, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> How is it that if I post something even with the slightest opinion, Marko >>>> shuts it down, and offline emails me. >>>> >>>> BUT >>>> >>>> This guy stays on the distro. I think Marko needs to pay closer watch an >>>> help us filter these guys out. ;) >>>> >>>> Oh, and I expect this continue, even after Marko emails me a nasty note >>>> from IPX. >>>> >>>> Happy labbing weekend, gents! >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP >>>> Sent from iJay >>>> >>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 7:22 AM, ccie onlyone <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> My friend got the new lab, just to get update, add me >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> ccietocome >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 2 >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:52:47 -0700 >>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>> >>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one >>> per a specific router.. >>> >>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each >>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. >>> >>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state >>> that each router should import the others route-target? >>> >>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do >>> something, you shouldn't do it.. >>> >>> Am I missing something here? >>> >>> V/R >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 3 >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:16:53 -0700 (PDT) >>> From: Breland Rogers <[email protected]> >>> To: IPEXPERT <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE level Labs >>> Message-ID: >>> <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 >>> >>> Hello,? >>> >>> Could anyone please share any free GNS3 CCIE level labs that are free. ?Im >>> 21 and on a budget. >>> >>> Thanks.? >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 4 >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 +0300 >>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>> Message-ID: >>> <CACv-o9uinWBPs9=s-kyf1qm5e2ekwrnhu6r7s8kq5+_zcgy...@mail.gmail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> >>> Hi fellas, >>> >>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>> >>> R2 ------ > hub >>> >>> >>> R2#sr | s bgp >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R2# >>> >>> >>> >>> R1 ----------> spoke >>> >>> R1#sr | s bg >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R1# >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> R5 --------> Spoke >>> >>> >>> R5#sr | s bg >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R5# >>> >>> here is my output from R2: >>> >>> >>> >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> State/PfxRcd >>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>> Active ---------------> it is >>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> State/PfxRcd >>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>> R2# >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 5 >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:42:52 +0000 >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: "khaled al-ajeman" <[email protected]>, >>> [email protected], [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>> Message-ID: >>> >>> <1993407919-1335076970-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-892677182-@b28.c9.bise7.blackberry> >>> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" >>> >>> Hi Khaled, >>> I am not familar with the topology but have u confirmed layer 3 >>> reachability between ur spoke and hub? Sourcing ur icmp pings from your >>> respective loopbacks? >>> Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>> Sender: [email protected] >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>> >>> Hi fellas, >>> >>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>> >>> R2 ------ > hub >>> >>> >>> R2#sr | s bgp >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R2# >>> >>> >>> >>> R1 ----------> spoke >>> >>> R1#sr | s bg >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R1# >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> R5 --------> Spoke >>> >>> >>> R5#sr | s bg >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R5# >>> >>> here is my output from R2: >>> >>> >>> >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> State/PfxRcd >>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>> Active ---------------> it is >>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> State/PfxRcd >>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>> R2# >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 6 >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:55:30 -0700 >>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> >>> To: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>> >>> Can you ping from each source BGP Speaker interface to the relevant peer? >>> >>> V/R >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> On 04/21/2012 10:57 PM, khaled al-ajeman wrote: >>>> Hi fellas, >>>> >>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>>> >>>> R2 ------> hub >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>> >>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R1# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R5 --------> Spoke >>>> >>>> >>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R5# >>>> >>>> here is my output from R2: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>> Active ---------------> it is >>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 7 >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:20:08 +0000 >>> From: Elie Raad <[email protected]> >>> To: Joe Danrich <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >>> <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>> Message-ID: >>> >>> <3840b1aaec7edd4caff9def3ad0131b81b8d7...@amsprd0104mb146.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> >>> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >>> >>> Hello Joe, >>> >>> I did the same as you did , but when i read in 29.9 he said that do not >>> change next-hop addresses of receiving routes from R2 and R8. which mean >>> that he want us to exchange routes coming from R2 and R8 . >>> >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Elie Raad >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: [email protected] >>> [[email protected]] on behalf of Joe Danrich >>> [[email protected]] >>> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 11:52 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>> >>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one >>> per a specific router.. >>> >>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each >>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. >>> >>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state >>> that each router should import the others route-target? >>> >>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do >>> something, you shouldn't do it.. >>> >>> Am I missing something here? >>> >>> V/R >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 >>> *************************************** >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
