On 4/27/2012 8:23 AM, Sidney D'Souza wrote:
Hi Vijaya,
The command below changed nothing. However changing the network type
of p2p on R1 and R3 shows 10.1.1.1 as next hop
Regards,
Sid
Nobody's really listening, until you make a mistake...
*From:*Vijaya Laxmi [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* 26 April 2012 19:15
*To:* Sidney D'Souza
*Subject:* Re: RE: EIGRP-OSPF Redistribution doesn't reflect the
correct next hop
Hi,
I see forwarding address yo be set to 10.1.1.2 in type 5 lsa .. So
them this is epected behavior..
If you want R3 to instead choose R1 as next hop.. Try
area X nsaa translate type7 suppress-fa on R1 (redistributing router)
hth
Vijaya
Sent from my ¥brant°
On Apr 26, 2012 9:54 AM, "Sidney D'Souza" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Sidney,
Changing ospf net type to p2p b/w R1 and R2 would *turn F.A. to be zero*
on type 5 LSA
and that in turn would be changing next hop of Ext route to R1
Quoting from Joe Astorino's earlier reply...
/These conditions set the forwarding address field to a non-zero address:
- OSPF is enabled on the ASBR's next hop interface AN
- ASBR's next hop interface is non-passive under OSPF AND
-*ASBR's next hop interface is not point-to-point AND>>>>>> You hit this
condition when u made changes !!*
- ASBR's next hop interface is not point-to-multipoint AND
- ASBR's next hop interface address falls under the network range
specified in the router ospf command.
These rules I have references from the following documentation:
/http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
09405a.shtml
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
