Marko
I get the point that you were coming from.. What I am driving at is why
the selection of using CQ... Normally people don't select something
unless there is a reason, with sometime that reason being comfort. Some
folks I know don't like CBWFQ cause they think it's too complex.
I also thought that maybe this was done to show different methods to
meet the requirement..
Ciao
Joe
On 06/14/2012 07:39 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
I was just trying to make a point that either solution would in fact
satisfy the requirements. Please keep in mind that the primary purpose
of all those labs is LEARNING. With that in mind, sometime the authors
will use different solutions that satisfy the requirements, but there
are many possible alternatives. In this case, either CBWFQ/HQF and CQ
satisfy the requirements.
--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Joe Danrich<[email protected]> wrote:
Nope.. Not from the requirement put forth..
"Configure a queue for traffic flowing over R9's serial interface. You will
use the following information"
The rest of the info is percentages of traffic..
While the solution is viable, CBWFQ could have been used for this, even
though custom queuing is discussed..
Now if one wants to get retentive, one could argue the custom queuing is a
single queue which it's not.
Joe
On 06/12/2012 10:29 AM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
Did you find anything telling you NOT to do it or use CBWFQ? :-)
--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:24 AM, marc abel<[email protected]> wrote:
I found the Volume 2 labs to be very ambiguous like this. I just read the
question and don't see anything forcing you to use custom queuing.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Joe Danrich<[email protected]> wrote:
In this task one is supposed configure a queue for traffic flowing over
R9's serial interface.. Information is provided in percentages..
In the solutions guide it discusses using custom queuing... After
reviewing the question (the rest of the lab too for that matter) I don't
see why custom queuing was selected over CBWFQ.. ..????
Is this just a matter of style or am I tired or reading the question
incorrectly?
Joe
______________________________**_________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
visit www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/**mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs<http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs>
--
Marc Abel
CCIE #35470
(Routing and Switching)
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
