Marko' signatures are all over Any of the difficult labs in volume 3. Regards, Joe Sanchez
On Jul 9, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> wrote: > Spot on :-) > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > > :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and > brevity. :: > > On Jul 9, 2012, at 17:33, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Exactly.. I am 100% sure Marko created this one :o) >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Tom Kacprzynski <[email protected]> >> To: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]>; [email protected] >> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 11:18 AM >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 3 Lab 5 ticket 1 >> >> >> Thank you for responding. Yes those are p2m non-broadcast. I understand that >> it creates the /32 and those are more preferred than the directly connected >> /24 subnet, but my question is why would the /32 be routed over other >> routers and not directly connected interface? Why would those /32 not have a >> better cost than directly connected links.... Oh wait it think i just >> figured it out. The cost of the frame-relay links is a lot higher by default >> than the cost of using FastEthernet links over few other routers, that's >> why....well played IPexpert...well played :) >> >> Thanks >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Tom, >>> >>> Is the ospf network type point-to-multipoint non-broadcast? I believe that >>> network type causes /32 host routes to be advertised? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Nick >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Tom Kacprzynski <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2012 11:13 PM >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 3 Lab 5 ticket 1 >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> Question regarding this ticket. It was about a BGP session not coming up >>> because routers were using point to multipoint non-broadcast ospf network >>> types and the /32 were being advertised using a different path and source >>> interfaces. >>> >>> I was able to solve it with ebgp multihop and specifying the source >>> interface. My question is why did these routers use the /32 host routes >>> going over few other routers and not directly connected interfaces? So I >>> understand the ticket solution just don't understand how the problem was >>> setup to cause it. >>> >>> Thanks in advance for any help. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Tom >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit http://www.ipexpert.com/ >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> http://www.platinumplacement.com/ >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
