I will take *no* responsibility for Lab 9 monstrosity! That was all Tyson! :-)
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Joe Sanchez <[email protected]> wrote: > Marko' signatures are all over Any of the difficult labs in volume 3. > > Regards, > Joe Sanchez > > On Jul 9, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Spot on :-) >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >> >> :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and >> brevity. :: >> >> On Jul 9, 2012, at 17:33, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Exactly.. I am 100% sure Marko created this one :o) >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Tom Kacprzynski <[email protected]> >>> To: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]>; [email protected] >>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 11:18 AM >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 3 Lab 5 ticket 1 >>> >>> >>> Thank you for responding. Yes those are p2m non-broadcast. I understand >>> that it creates the /32 and those are more preferred than the directly >>> connected /24 subnet, but my question is why would the /32 be routed over >>> other routers and not directly connected interface? Why would those /32 not >>> have a better cost than directly connected links.... Oh wait it think i >>> just figured it out. The cost of the frame-relay links is a lot higher by >>> default than the cost of using FastEthernet links over few other routers, >>> that's why....well played IPexpert...well played :) >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tom, >>>> >>>> Is the ospf network type point-to-multipoint non-broadcast? I believe >>>> that network type causes /32 host routes to be advertised? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Nick >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Tom Kacprzynski <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2012 11:13 PM >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 3 Lab 5 ticket 1 >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> Question regarding this ticket. It was about a BGP session not coming up >>>> because routers were using point to multipoint non-broadcast ospf network >>>> types and the /32 were being advertised using a different path and source >>>> interfaces. >>>> >>>> I was able to solve it with ebgp multihop and specifying the source >>>> interface. My question is why did these routers use the /32 host routes >>>> going over few other routers and not directly connected interfaces? So I >>>> understand the ticket solution just don't understand how the problem was >>>> setup to cause it. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance for any help. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit http://www.ipexpert.com/ >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> http://www.platinumplacement.com/ >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
