thanks Bob and Adam.I think i get the gist of it..isatap gives itself to IGPs because it was meant for intrasite connectivity while 6to4 would either run statics or ebgp due to its intersite nature. Lovely link btw Bob, perfect explanation Rgds, Mo On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since ISATAP tunnels create a virtual NBMA topology where all endpoints > have an address in a common subnet, you can configure OSPFv3 in > Non-Broadcast mode over an ISATAP interface and it works. I've labbed that > one up. > > Also, Keith Barker has a write-up for a BGP over 6to4 config. I haven't > gotten to replicate this one myself yet, but it looks quite reasonable: > > > https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/11562-102-1-43914/Dynamic%20Routing%20Over%206to4%20Automatic%20Tunnels,%20Really.pdf > > > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Maureen Maina <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> Was configuring ipv6 over ip tunnels yesterday and was wondering if there >> is any routing protocol support over non-gre tunnels particularly ISATAP >> and 6to4 tunnels. >> Are there any design considerations to accomplish this? >> >> Regards, >> Mo >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
