But best practice is out the window in the lab, right?

Are we both correct and satisfy the task?  

Sorry, but I have this friend and his initials are O.C.D.


Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 14, 2012, at 1:40 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> wrote:

> I like what I read. I like it very much :-)
> 
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
> 
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Joe Sanchez <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Nick,  when I did this lab I thought the same thing, but after looking at 
>> the idea of using some other method of learning the lo0 via BGP and an IGP I 
>> thought about how would the backdoor command come into play; which it would 
>> never help because if you loose the IGP route and the 1.1.1.1 was populated 
>> into the BGP table, we would drop the connection anyways, therefore removing 
>> the network statement from R1 was the only logical answer I could come up 
>> with.  In this particular case there is a single connection with two peers 
>> from R1s perspective.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Joe Sanchez
>> 
>> ( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile 
>> device.  Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.)
>> 
>> On Sep 14, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Spoiler alert:  Do not read ahead if you have not done this lab/question 
>>> yet!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ticket 5 is as follows:
>>> "The BGP peering between R1 and R2/R4 is flapping and needs to be 
>>> stabilized.  Please correct the problem."
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From my first look at R2 and R4, it appears that they are learning about 
>>> 1.1.1.1 (update source) through BGP which would of course cause problems.  
>>> The solution is to remove network 1.1.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255 from router 
>>> 1, but to me this seems like it would go against "keep the spirit of the 
>>> config".
>>> 
>>> What I did on R2 and R4:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> router bgp 2456
>>> network 1.1.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255 backdoor
>>> 
>>> This makes the preferred route to 1.1.1.1 over OSPF instead of BGP by 
>>> making the distance of the 1.1.1.1 route 200 and keeps the config intact.
>>> 
>>> Is this a better/worse solution?  Do I not understand the function of the 
>>> BGP backdoor?
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> Nick
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> 
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>> 
>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> 
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to