I can't believe it, working on real hardware as well:

interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.0.46.6 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 standby 0 ip 10.0.46.1


router bgp 456
 no synchronization
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 neighbor 10.0.46.55 remote-as 456
 no auto-summary


------------------------------------------------------------------


interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.0.46.55 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto


router bgp 456
 no synchronization
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 neighbor 10.0.46.1 remote-as 456
 no auto-summary


R5(config-router)#do sh ip bgp sum
BGP router identifier 10.0.46.55, local AS number 456
BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1

Neighbor        V          AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down  
State/PfxRcd
10.0.46.1       4          456       5             5       1         0          
    0 00:03:18        0


R5(config-router)#do sh tcp brief
TCB       Local Address                  Foreign Address             (state)
66A1041C       10.0.46.55.39341            10.0.46.1.179                 ESTAB


System image file is "flash:c1841-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T7.bin"



________________________________
 From: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]>
To: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> 
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP 
virtual IP ?
 
Just what I need, another OCD day.  Oh well, I'll be home in about 8 hours and 
will have access to real hardware.  I will let everyone know what happens.

Nick

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 11, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote:

> Interesting. I was also pretty sure that didn't work. At best it would
> only do a passive open (respond to a TCP syn) no originate the
> session.
> 
> Bob
> -- 
> Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos.
> 
> On Oct 11, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> //Disclaimer:  I am using GNS3 for this example.
>> 
>> This is the way I understand it, anyone else feel free to chime in:
>> 
>> Think update source.
>> 
>> router bgp 4
>> neighbor 10.0.4.5 remote-as 5
>> neighbor 10.0.4.5 update-source FastEthernet0/0
>> 
>> 
>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>> ip address 10.0.4.4 255.255.255.0
>> duplex auto
>> speed auto
>> standby 0 ip 10.0.4.254
>> 
>> how can I create a neighborship by sourcing the standby 0 IP?  I can't.
>> 
>> Let's look at router 5 on the other side
>> 
>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>> ip address 10.0.4.5 255.255.255.0
>> duplex auto
>> speed auto
>> 
>> router bgp 5
>> no synchronization
>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>> neighbor 10.0.1.1 remote-as 1
>> neighbor 10.0.4.254 remote-as 4
>> no auto-summary
>> 
>> 
>> Let's debug BGP on R4
>> 
>> R4(config-router)#no
>> *Mar  1 00:31:36.267: BGP: 10.0.4.5 passive open to 10.0.4.254
>> *Mar  1 00:31:36.271: BGP: 10.0.4.5 passive open failed - 10.0.4.254 is not 
>> update-source FastEthernet0/0's address (10.0.4.4)
>> *Mar  1 00:31:36.271: BGP: 10.0.4.5 remote connection attempt failed, local 
>> address 10.0.4.254
>> R4(config-router)#no
>> *Mar  1 00:31:38.255: BGP: 10.0.4.5 open active, local address 10.0.4.4
>> *Mar  1 00:31:38.311: BGP: 10.0.4.5 open failed: Connection refused by 
>> remote host, open active delayed 26388ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter)
>> R4(config-router)#no
>> 
>> ok it is complaining about 10.0.4.254 not being fa0/0's address.  Fine, I 
>> will remove update source fa0/0
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> router bgp 4
>> no synchronization
>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>> neighbor 10.0.4.2 remote-as 2
>> neighbor 10.0.4.3 remote-as 3
>> neighbor 10.0.4.5 remote-as 5
>> neighbor 10.0.4.5 update-source FastEthernet0/0
>> maximum-paths 3
>> no auto-summary
>> 
>> no neighbor 10.0.4.5 update-source FastEthernet0/0
>> 
>> BGP: 10.0.4.5 rcvd OPEN w/ remote AS 5
>> *Mar  1 00:33:09.427: BGP: 10.0.4.5 went from OpenSent to OpenConfirm
>> *Mar  1 00:33:09.427: BGP: 10.0.4.5 send message type 1, length (incl. 
>> header) 45
>> *Mar  1 00:33:09.475: BGP: 10.0.4.5 went from OpenConfirm to Established
>> *Mar  1 00:33:09.475: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.4.5 Up
>> 
>> uh oh, it is working!  Interesting.. I am in GNS3 but will lab it up at home 
>> on real hardware once I get there.  This is not the behavior I expected.
>> 
>> R5#sh ip bgp sum
>> [...]
>> Neighbor        V    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down  
>> State/PfxRcd
>> 10.0.1.1        4     1      40      40        2    0    0 00:36:01        1
>> 10.0.4.254      4     4      16      22        2    0    0 00:02:47        1
>> 
>> 
>> I also tested it with iBGP and the same behavior occured.  I also failed 
>> over the HSRP address and made another node active as 10.0.4.254 and the 
>> adjacency did come back up on that router!
>> 
>> I will try this out on real hardware once I get home and then report back.  
>> We had tried this in production 2 months ago using ASR1000s and could not 
>> get it working.
>> 
>> Nick
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Samir Idris <[email protected]>
>> To: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Taqdir Singh <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" 
>> <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 7:50 AM
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP 
>> virtual IP ?
>> 
>> 
>> Nick,
>> 
>> Why cant we source from a virtual IP?  Can you shed some light on the logic?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Samir.
>> 
>> On Thursday, October 11, 2012, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Taqdir,
>>> 
>>> You have to source from a physical interface and cannot source from a vIP.  
>>> Here is a link to "best practice" using HSRP and multihomed BGP 
>>> environments:
>>> 
>>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080093f2c.shtml
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> Nick
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Taqdir Singh <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:16 AM
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP 
>>> virtual IP ?
>>> 
>>> Hello team can we make bgp neighborship with HSRP virtual IP ?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>> visit http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>> 
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>>> http://www.platinumplacement.com/
>>> 
>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>> visit http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>> 
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>>> http://www.platinumplacement.com/
>>> 
>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>> 
>> --
>> Samir Idris
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> 
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to