There has to be instability issues, right?  Flapping, arps and macs getting 
hosed perhaps?  

*Paging Dr. Marko*


________________________________
 From: Tony Singh <[email protected]>
To: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> 
Cc: Bob McCouch <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP 
virtual IP ?
 

Good work Nick

I'm sure Cisco know this works..? Why do they not recommend it then ...


--
BR

Tony
Sent from my iPhone on 3

On 11 Oct 2012, at 23:06, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote:



>
>R5(config-router)#do sh ip b
>*Oct 11 22:09:20.495: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.46.1 Down User reset
>*Oct 11 22:09:20.907: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.46.1 Up gp
>BGP table version is 16, local router ID is 10.0.46.55
>Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
>              r RIB-failure, S Stale
>Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
>
>   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
>*>i192.46.1.0       10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.2.0       10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.3.0       10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.4.0       10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.5.0       10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.6.0       10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.7.0       10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.8.0       10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.9.0       10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.10.0      10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.11.0      10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.12.0      10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.13.0      10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.14.0      10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>*>i192.46.15.0      10.0.46.1             1234    100  10000 i
>R5(config-router)#
>
>
>i need a fast way to copy and paste prefixes in  :)
>
>
>I did manipulate weight, MED...
>
>________________________________
> From: Tony Singh <[email protected]>
>To: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> 
>Cc: Bob McCouch <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" 
><[email protected]> 
>Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:54 PM
>Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP 
>virtual IP ?
> 
>Take it further see how many prefixes it can handle, check metrics work weight 
>local pref med...
>
>--
>BR
>
>Tony
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
>On 11 Oct 2012, at 22:34, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I can't believe it, working on real hardware as well:
>> 
>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>  ip address 10.0.46.6 255.255.255.0
>>  duplex auto
>>  speed auto
>>  standby 0 ip 10.0.46.1
>> 
>> 
>> router bgp 456
>>  no synchronization
>>  bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>  neighbor 10.0.46.55 remote-as 456
>>  no auto-summary
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>  ip address 10.0.46.55 255.255.255.0
>>  duplex
 auto
>>  speed auto
>> 
>> 
>> router bgp 456
>>  no synchronization
>>  bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>  neighbor 10.0.46.1 remote-as 456
>>  no auto-summary
>> 
>> 
>> R5(config-router)#do sh ip bgp sum
>> BGP router identifier 10.0.46.55, local AS number 456
>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
>> 
>> Neighbor        V          AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down  
>> State/PfxRcd
>> 10.0.46.1       4          456       5             5       1         0       
>>        0 00:03:18        0
>> 
>> 
>> R5(config-router)#do sh tcp brief
>> TCB       Local Address 
                 Foreign Address             (state)
>> 66A1041C       10.0.46.55.39341            10.0.46.1.179                 
>> ESTAB
>> 
>> 
>> System image file is "flash:c1841-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T7.bin"
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]>
>> To: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> 
>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:51 AM
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP 
>> virtual IP ?
>> 
>> Just what I need, another OCD day.  Oh well, I'll be home in about 8 hours 
>> and will have access to real hardware.  I will let everyone know what 
>> happens.
>> 
>> Nick
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Oct 11, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Interesting. I was also pretty sure that didn't work. At best it would
>>> only do a passive open (respond to a TCP syn) no originate the
>>> session.
>>> 
>>> Bob
>>> -- 
>>> Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos.
>>> 
>>> On Oct 11, 2012, at 8:25 AM,
 Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> //Disclaimer:  I am using GNS3 for this example.
>>>> 
>>>> This is the way I understand it, anyone else feel free to chime in:
>>>> 
>>>> Think update source.
>>>> 
>>>> router bgp 4
>>>> neighbor 10.0.4.5 remote-as 5
>>>> neighbor 10.0.4.5 update-source FastEthernet0/0
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>>> ip address 10.0.4.4 255.255.255.0
>>>> duplex auto
>>>> speed auto
>>>> standby 0 ip 10.0.4.254
>>>> 
>>>> how can I create a neighborship by sourcing the standby 0 IP?  I can't.
>>>> 
>>>> Let's look at router 5 on the other side
>>>> 
>>>> interface
 FastEthernet0/0
>>>> ip address 10.0.4.5 255.255.255.0
>>>> duplex auto
>>>> speed auto
>>>> 
>>>> router bgp 5
>>>> no synchronization
>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>>> neighbor 10.0.1.1 remote-as 1
>>>> neighbor 10.0.4.254 remote-as 4
>>>> no auto-summary
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Let's debug BGP on R4
>>>> 
>>>> R4(config-router)#no
>>>> *Mar  1 00:31:36.267: BGP: 10.0.4.5 passive open to 10.0.4.254
>>>> *Mar  1 00:31:36.271: BGP: 10.0.4.5 passive open failed - 10.0.4.254 is 
>>>> not update-source FastEthernet0/0's address (10.0.4.4)
>>>> *Mar  1 00:31:36.271: BGP: 10.0.4.5 remote connection attempt failed, 
>>>> local address 10.0.4.254
>>>> R4(config-router)#no
>>>> *Mar  1 00:31:38.255: BGP: 10.0.4.5 open active, local address
 10.0.4.4
>>>> *Mar  1 00:31:38.311: BGP: 10.0.4.5 open failed: Connection refused by 
>>>> remote host, open active delayed 26388ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter)
>>>> R4(config-router)#no
>>>> 
>>>> ok it is complaining about 10.0.4.254 not being fa0/0's address.  Fine, I 
>>>> will remove update source fa0/0
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> router bgp 4
>>>> no synchronization
>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>>>> neighbor 10.0.4.2 remote-as 2
>>>> neighbor 10.0.4.3 remote-as 3
>>>> neighbor 10.0.4.5 remote-as 5
>>>> neighbor 10.0.4.5 update-source FastEthernet0/0
>>>> maximum-paths 3
>>>> no auto-summary
>>>> 
>>>> no neighbor 10.0.4.5 update-source FastEthernet0/0
>>>> 
>>>> BGP: 10.0.4.5 rcvd OPEN w/ remote AS 5
>>>> *Mar  1
 00:33:09.427: BGP: 10.0.4.5 went from OpenSent to OpenConfirm
>>>> *Mar  1 00:33:09.427: BGP: 10.0.4.5 send message type 1, length (incl. 
>>>> header) 45
>>>> *Mar  1 00:33:09.475: BGP: 10.0.4.5 went from OpenConfirm to Established
>>>> *Mar  1 00:33:09.475: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.4.5 Up
>>>> 
>>>> uh oh, it is working!  Interesting.. I am in GNS3 but will lab it up at 
>>>> home on real hardware once I get there.  This is not the behavior I 
>>>> expected.
>>>> 
>>>> R5#sh ip bgp sum
>>>> [...]
>>>> Neighbor        V    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down  
>>>> State/PfxRcd
>>>> 10.0.1.1        4     1      40      40        2    0    0 00:36:01       
 1
>>>> 10.0.4.254      4     4      16      22        2    0    0 00:02:47        
>>>> 1
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I also tested it with iBGP and the same behavior occured.  I also failed 
>>>> over the HSRP address and made another node active as 10.0.4.254 and the 
>>>> adjacency did come back up on that router!
>>>> 
>>>> I will try this out on real hardware once I get home and then report 
>>>> back.  We had tried this in production 2 months ago using ASR1000s and 
>>>> could not get it working.
>>>> 
>>>> Nick
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Samir Idris <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Taqdir Singh <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" 
>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 7:50 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP 
>>>> virtual IP ?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Nick,
>>>> 
>>>> Why cant we source from a virtual IP?  Can you shed some light on the 
>>>> logic?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Samir.
>>>> 
>>>> On Thursday, October 11, 2012, Nick
 Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Taqdir,
>>>>> 
>>>>> You have to source from a physical interface and cannot source from a 
>>>>> vIP.  Here is a link to "best practice" using HSRP and multihomed BGP 
>>>>> environments:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080093f2c.shtml
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> Nick
>>>>> 
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: Taqdir Singh <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:16 AM
>>>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP 
>>>>> virtual IP ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello team can we make bgp neighborship with HSRP virtual IP ?
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>>>> visit http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>>>>> http://www.platinumplacement.com/
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>>>> visit http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>>>>> http://www.platinumplacement.com/
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Samir Idris
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>> 
>>>> Are
 you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>>> 
>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> 
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> 
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to