Thanks Marko. Can you setup a Sham link when you only have 1 PE and 2 different VRFs going to the customer?
Respectfully, Ryan Krcelic On 11/30/12 7:07 PM, "Marko Milivojevic" <[email protected]> wrote: > Sham-link is not a superbackbone. MP-BGP is a superbackbone. And yes, > you can set-up sham-link between any two PEs, as long as they have the > routes to each other. > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) > Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Ryan Krcelic <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is it possible to setup a sham-link on a single router between 2 different >> VRFs? For example in WB3 Lab 10 you setup the OSPF super backbone between >> R1-R9-R2. Once you adjust the ospf domain-id on R9 you get the routes from >> R1 to show on R2 as IA and vice versa. Is it possible to setup a sham-link >> on R9 between ospf process AS1 and ospf process AS2? >> >> Sample config >> Router ospf 1 vrf AS1 >> Redis bgp 69 subnets >> Router ospf 2 vrf AS2 >> Redis bgp 69 subnets >> Router bgp 69 >> Add ipv4 vrf AS1 >> Redist ospf 1 match internal >> Add ipv4 vrf AS2 >> Redist ospf 2 match internal >> >> I tried creating 2 new loopbacks, redistributing them into BGP and >> configuring the SHAM-Link under each OSPF process but the sham-link would >> not come up. Is this normal behavior? Are you required to have 2 PE >> routers to establish a Sham-link? >> >> V/r, >> >> Ryan Krcelic >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs V/r, Ryan Krcelic _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
