Let's take it from here. Configs :-) -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
:: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and brevity. :: On Nov 30, 2012, at 21:29, Ryan Krcelic <[email protected]> wrote: > I could not get the Sham Link to come up. I could see the Hellos going out > to the 2 different loopbacks I created and redistributed into BGP, but I > guess you cannot get a shamlink to form between 2 different VRFs on the same > router. > > > On 12/1/12 4:36 AM, "Marko Milivojevic" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> MP-BGP *is* the superbackbone. Which IGP is running in the core is >> irrelevant. >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert >> >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Samir Idris <[email protected]> wrote: >>> MP-BGP or OSPF in the core makes it a superbackbone? >>> >>> >>> On Saturday, December 1, 2012, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Sham-link is not a superbackbone. MP-BGP is a superbackbone. And yes, >>>> you can set-up sham-link between any two PEs, as long as they have the >>>> routes to each other. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Ryan Krcelic <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Is it possible to setup a sham-link on a single router between 2 >>>>> different >>>>> VRFs? For example in WB3 Lab 10 you setup the OSPF super backbone >>>>> between >>>>> R1-R9-R2. Once you adjust the ospf domain-id on R9 you get the routes >>>>> from >>>>> R1 to show on R2 as IA and vice versa. Is it possible to setup a >>>>> sham-link >>>>> on R9 between ospf process AS1 and ospf process AS2? >>>>> >>>>> Sample config >>>>> Router ospf 1 vrf AS1 >>>>> Redis bgp 69 subnets >>>>> Router ospf 2 vrf AS2 >>>>> Redis bgp 69 subnets >>>>> Router bgp 69 >>>>> Add ipv4 vrf AS1 >>>>> Redist ospf 1 match internal >>>>> Add ipv4 vrf AS2 >>>>> Redist ospf 2 match internal >>>>> >>>>> I tried creating 2 new loopbacks, redistributing them into BGP and >>>>> configuring the SHAM-Link under each OSPF process but the sham-link would >>>>> not come up. Is this normal behavior? Are you required to have 2 PE >>>>> routers to establish a Sham-link? >>>>> >>>>> V/r, >>>>> >>>>> Ryan Krcelic >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> -- >>> Samir Idris > > V/r, > > Ryan Krcelic > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
